Literature DB >> 32293944

Vowel and Sibilant Production in Noise: Effects of Noise Frequency and Phonological Similarity.

Kevin J Reilly1.   

Abstract

Purpose This study investigated vowel and sibilant productions in noise to determine whether responses to noise (a) are sensitive to the spectral characteristics of the noise signal and (b) are modulated by the contribution of vowel or sibilant contrasts to word discrimination. Method Vowel and sibilant productions were elicited during serial recall of three-word sequences that were produced in quiet or during exposure to speaker-specific noise signals. These signals either masked a speaker's productions of the sibilants /s/ and /ʃ/ or their productions of the vowels /a/ and /æ/. The contribution of the vowel and sibilant contrasts to word discrimination in a sequence was manipulated by varying the number of times that the target sibilant and vowel pairs occurred in the same word position in each sequence. Results Spectral noise effects were observed for both sibilants and vowels: Responses to noise were larger and/or involved to more acoustic features when the noise signal masked the acoustic characteristics of that phoneme class. Word discrimination effects were limited and consisted of only small increases in vowel duration. Interaction effects between noise and similarity indicated that the phonological similarity of sequences containing both sibilants and/or both vowels influenced articulation in ways not related to speech clarity. Conclusion The findings of this study indicate that sensorimotor control of speech exhibits some sensitivity to noise spectral characteristics. However, productions of sibilants and vowels were not sensitive to their importance in discriminating the words in a sequence. In addition, phonological similarity effects were observed that likely reflected processing demands related to the recall and sequencing of high-similarity words.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32293944      PMCID: PMC7242990          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  43 in total

1.  Analog studies of the nasalization of vowels.

Authors:  A S HOUSE; K N STEVENS
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1956-06

2.  Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners.

Authors:  Anne Cutler; Andrea Weber; Roel Smits; Nicole Cooper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Vocal intensity in speakers and singers.

Authors:  I R Titze; J Sundberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise.

Authors:  Sandeep A Phatak; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Kazumi Maniwa; Allard Jongman; Travis Wade
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English fricatives.

Authors:  Kazumi Maniwa; Allard Jongman; Travis Wade
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Evidence that the Lombard effect is frequency-specific in humans.

Authors:  Lauren M Stowe; Edward J Golob
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced in noise and while wearing an oxygen mask.

Authors:  Z S Bond; T J Moore; B Gable
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The effects of multitalker and masker noise on fundamental frequency variability during spontaneous speech for children and adults.

Authors:  C Rivers; M P Rastatter
Journal:  J Aud Res       Date:  1985-01

10.  Accurate vocal compensation for sound intensity loss with increasing distance in natural environments.

Authors:  Pavel Zahorik; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.