Literature DB >> 2231111

Reading with fixed and variable character pitch.

A Arditi1, K Knoblauch, I Grunwald.   

Abstract

We compared the effects of fixed and variable (proportional) spacing on reading speeds and found variable pitch to yield better performance at medium and large character sizes and fixed pitch to be superior for character sizes approaching the acuity limit. The data indicate at least two crowding effects at the smallest sizes: one that interferes with individual character identification and one that interferes with word identification. A control experiment using rapid serial visual presentation suggests that it is the greater horizontal compression and consequently reduced eye-movement requirements of variable pitch that are responsible for its superiority at medium and large character sizes.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2231111     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.7.002011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  9 in total

1.  The mechanism of word crowding.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Melanie M U Akau; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Reading speed benefits from increased vertical word spacing in normal peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Effects of increased letter spacing on word identification and eye guidance during reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

4.  Serifs and font legibility.

Authors:  Aries Arditi; Jianna Cho
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Shift in spatial scale in identifying crowded letters.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Sing-Hang Cheung; Gordon E Legge; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Learning to identify crowded letters: does it improve reading speed?

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Saccadic overhead: information-processing time with and without saccades.

Authors:  E Matin; K C Shao; K R Boff
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-04

9.  Fonts Designed for Macular Degeneration: Impact on Reading.

Authors:  Ying-Zi Xiong; Ethan A Lorsung; John Stephen Mansfield; Charles Bigelow; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.