Literature DB >> 12207981

Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading.

Gordon E Legge1, Thomas A Hooven, Timothy S Klitz, J Stephen Stephen Mansfield, Bosco S Tjan.   

Abstract

The integration of visual, lexical, and oculomotor information is a critical part of reading. Mr. Chips is an ideal-observer model that combines these sources of information optimally to read simple texts in the minimum number of saccades. This model provides a computational framework for interpreting human reading saccades in both normal and low vision. The purpose of this paper is to report performance of the model for conditions emulating reading with normal vision--a visual span of nine characters, multiplicative saccade noise with a standard deviation of 30%, and texts based on three full-length children's books. Comparison of fixation locations by humans and Mr. Chips revealed: (1) that both exhibit very similar word-skipping behavior; (2) both show initial fixations near the center of words, but with a systematic difference suggestive of an asymmetry in the human visual span; and (3) differences in the pattern of refixations within words that may uncover non-optimal lexical inference by human readers. A human context effect--30% difference in mean saccade size between continuous text and random sequences of words--was very similar to the 25% effect for the model associated with a corresponding difference in the predictability of text words. Overall, our findings show that many of the complicated aspects of human reading saccades can be explained concisely by early information-processing constraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12207981     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00131-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  28 in total

1.  Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 0.957

2.  Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Brianna M Eiter; Ralph Radach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The relationship between word length and threshold character size in patients with central scotoma and eccentric fixation.

Authors:  Anouk Déruaz; Mira Goldschmidt; Christophe Mermoud; Andrew R Whatham; Avinoam B Safran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Sing-Hang Cheung; Gordon E Legge; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading.

Authors:  Ralph Radach; Lynn Huestegge; Ronan Reilly
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-21

Review 6.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Stop before you saccade: Looking into an artificial peripheral scotoma.

Authors:  Christian P Janssen; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Efficient saccade planning requires time and clear choices.

Authors:  Saiedeh Ghahghaei; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Reading as active sensing: a computational model of gaze planning in word recognition.

Authors:  Marcello Ferro; Dimitri Ognibene; Giovanni Pezzulo; Vito Pirrelli
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  The utility of modeling word identification from visual input within models of eye movements in reading.

Authors:  Klinton Bicknell; Roger Levy
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.