Literature DB >> 18214613

Effects of reverberant spatial cues on attention-dependent object formation.

Adrian K C Lee1, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham.   

Abstract

A recent study showed that when a sound mixture has ambiguous spectrotemporal structure, spatial cues alone are sufficient to change the balance of grouping cues and affect the perceptual organization of the auditory scene. The current study synthesizes similar stimuli in a reverberant setting to see whether the interaural decorrelation caused by reverberant energy reduces the influence of spatial cues on perceptual organization. Results suggest that reverberant spatial cues are less influential on perceptual segregation than anechoic spatial cues. In addition, results replicate an interesting finding from the earlier study, where an ambiguous tone that could logically belong to either a repeating tone sequence or a simultaneous harmonic complex can sometimes "disappear" and never be heard as part of the perceptual foreground, no matter which object a listener attends. As in the previous study, the perceived energy of the ambiguous element does not "trade" between the objects in a complex scene (i.e., the element does not necessarily contribute more to one object when it contributes less to a competing object). Results are consistent with the idea that the perceptual organization of an acoustic mixture depends on what object a listener attends.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18214613      PMCID: PMC2536802          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0109-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  18 in total

1.  Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of reverberation on spatial, prosodic, and vocal-tract size cues to selective attention.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  On the role of space and time in auditory processing.

Authors:  S Shamma
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Effects of reverberation on perceptual segregation of competing voices.

Authors:  John F Culling; Kathryn I Hodder; Chaz Yee Toh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Rhodri Cusack; John Deeks; Genevieve Aikman; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The influence of spatial separation on divided listening.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Frederick J Gallun; Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A sound element gets lost in perceptual competition.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adrian K C Lee; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Auditory grouping.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; R Cusack; J M Foxton; I H Robertson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Perceiving vowels in the presence of another sound: constraints on formant perception.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Why middle-aged listeners have trouble hearing in everyday settings.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Feature assignment in perception of auditory figure.

Authors:  Melissa K Gregg; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Measuring the perceived content of auditory objects using a matching paradigm.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Steve Babcock; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-05-13

4.  Localization interference between components in an auditory scene.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Ade Deane-Pratt; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  The what, where and how of auditory-object perception.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Effects of frequency disparities on trading of an ambiguous tone between two competing auditory objects.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.