BACKGROUND: Errors in the judgement of puncture level during neuraxial anaesthesia can lead to significant complications. The aim of this study was to assess, in obstetric anaesthesia, the accuracy of clinical determination of the lumbar spinal interspace level, using surface ultrasound imaging as control. METHODS: At the anaesthesia follow-up visit, women who had received lumbar neuraxial anaesthesia during labour were prospectively included. The intervertebral level of needle insertion, located by the needle scar position, was identified by ultrasonography and compared with the clinical level reported on the chart by the anaesthetist who performed the block. RESULTS: Ninety-nine women were studied. The clinical puncture level was accurate in 36.4% of patients. Ultrasound examination showed the puncture level to be more cephalad than the level noted in the anaesthetic record in almost 50% of patients. In 15% of patients, the puncture level was more caudad than the anaesthetist had assessed. Factors including type of anaesthesia, indication, time period, level of anaesthetic experience, BMI, and spinal pathology did not seem to influence the frequency of errors. CONCLUSIONS: The observed differences between clinical and ultrasonic identification of spinal puncture level highlight the potential for serious complications associated with the performance of neuraxial blocks above the spinous process of L3 in the parturient. With the increase in popularity of techniques involving puncture of the dura mater for labour anaesthesia, we feel that awareness of this risk is important.
BACKGROUND: Errors in the judgement of puncture level during neuraxial anaesthesia can lead to significant complications. The aim of this study was to assess, in obstetric anaesthesia, the accuracy of clinical determination of the lumbar spinal interspace level, using surface ultrasound imaging as control. METHODS: At the anaesthesia follow-up visit, women who had received lumbar neuraxial anaesthesia during labour were prospectively included. The intervertebral level of needle insertion, located by the needle scar position, was identified by ultrasonography and compared with the clinical level reported on the chart by the anaesthetist who performed the block. RESULTS: Ninety-nine women were studied. The clinical puncture level was accurate in 36.4% of patients. Ultrasound examination showed the puncture level to be more cephalad than the level noted in the anaesthetic record in almost 50% of patients. In 15% of patients, the puncture level was more caudad than the anaesthetist had assessed. Factors including type of anaesthesia, indication, time period, level of anaesthetic experience, BMI, and spinal pathology did not seem to influence the frequency of errors. CONCLUSIONS: The observed differences between clinical and ultrasonic identification of spinal puncture level highlight the potential for serious complications associated with the performance of neuraxial blocks above the spinous process of L3 in the parturient. With the increase in popularity of techniques involving puncture of the dura mater for labour anaesthesia, we feel that awareness of this risk is important.
Authors: Adil S Ahmed; Raahul Ramakrishnan; Vignesh Ramachandran; Shyam S Ramachandran; Kevin Phan; Erik L Antonsen Journal: J Spine Surg Date: 2018-06
Authors: Nilam J Soni; Ricardo Franco-Sadud; Ketino Kobaidze; Daniel Schnobrich; Gerard Salame; Joshua Lenchus; Venkat Kalidindi; Michael J Mader; Elizabeth K Haro; Ria Dancel; Joel Cho; Loretta Grikis; Brian P Lucas Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 2.960