Ting Zheng1, Peng Ye1, Weilan Wu1, Bin Hu2, Lifei Chen1, Xiaochun Zheng1,3, Mingxue Lin1. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China. 2. Department of Anaesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 3. Fujian Emergency Medical Center, Fuzhou, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the many advantages real-time ultrasound-guided lumbar anesthesia has over traditional lumbar anesthesia, it seemingly involves a much higher dose of ropivacaine. This study aimed to determine the minimum local anesthetic dose (MLAD) and the 95% confidence interval of ropivacaine at different concentrations in real-time ultrasound-guided lumbar anesthesia for lower extremity surgery. METHODS: A total of 60 patients who were consecutively scheduled for selective lower extremity surgery were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, which each received different concentrations of ropivacaine at different initial dosages when Dixon's up-and-down sequential method was applied. The high ropivacaine group and the low ropivacaine group received 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine, respectively. The patients' baseline characteristics, the MLAD, and the 95% confidence interval were assessed. The highest level of sensory block, time to reach the T10 sensory block, duration for sensory blocks higher than T10, highest plane for sensory block, and onset time and duration for motor block were recorded. Comparisons were also made between the patients' vital signs and adverse reactions. RESULTS: The minimum local anaesthetic dose (MLAD) and 95% confidence interval in the high ropivacaine group and the low ropivacaine group were 17.176 (16.276 to 18.124) and 20.192 (19.256 to 21.174) mg, respectively. Moreover, motor block maintenance was greatly reduced in the 0.5% ropivacaine compared to the 0.75% ropivacaine group (P=0.0309). CONCLUSIONS: In real-time ultrasound-guided intraspinal anesthesia for lower extremity surgery, both 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine provide satisfactory anesthesia. Our results suggest that shortened motor block duration can hold benefits for patients including earlier mobilization and a quicker rehabilitation process. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Despite the many advantages real-time ultrasound-guided lumbar anesthesia has over traditional lumbar anesthesia, it seemingly involves a much higher dose of ropivacaine. This study aimed to determine the minimum local anesthetic dose (MLAD) and the 95% confidence interval of ropivacaine at different concentrations in real-time ultrasound-guided lumbar anesthesia for lower extremity surgery. METHODS: A total of 60 patients who were consecutively scheduled for selective lower extremity surgery were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, which each received different concentrations of ropivacaine at different initial dosages when Dixon's up-and-down sequential method was applied. The high ropivacaine group and the low ropivacaine group received 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine, respectively. The patients' baseline characteristics, the MLAD, and the 95% confidence interval were assessed. The highest level of sensory block, time to reach the T10 sensory block, duration for sensory blocks higher than T10, highest plane for sensory block, and onset time and duration for motor block were recorded. Comparisons were also made between the patients' vital signs and adverse reactions. RESULTS: The minimum local anaesthetic dose (MLAD) and 95% confidence interval in the high ropivacaine group and the low ropivacaine group were 17.176 (16.276 to 18.124) and 20.192 (19.256 to 21.174) mg, respectively. Moreover, motor block maintenance was greatly reduced in the 0.5% ropivacaine compared to the 0.75% ropivacaine group (P=0.0309). CONCLUSIONS: In real-time ultrasound-guided intraspinal anesthesia for lower extremity surgery, both 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine provide satisfactory anesthesia. Our results suggest that shortened motor block duration can hold benefits for patients including earlier mobilization and a quicker rehabilitation process. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
Authors: J M Malinovsky; F Charles; O Kick; J Y Lepage; M Malinge; A Cozian; O Bouchot; M Pinaud Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Andrea Michalek-Sauberer; Sibylle A Kozek-Langenecker; Harald Heinzl; Engelbert Deusch; Astrid Chiari Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.288