Literature DB >> 24141882

A randomized controlled trial of preinsertion ultrasound guidance for spinal anaesthesia in pregnancy: outcomes among obese and lean parturients: ultrasound for spinal anesthesia in pregnancy.

Tulay Sahin1, Onur Balaban, Levent Sahin, Mine Solak, Kamil Toker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study was conducted to examine if preinsertion lumbar ultrasound scanning helps with performance of spinal puncture, as a tool for decreasing the number of puncture attempts and spinal procedure time and increasing the success rate. We hypothesized that ultrasound can facilitate neuraxial blockade, particularly in pregnant women with difficult topographic anatomy.
METHODS: One hundred (50 lean, BMI <30 kg/m(2), and 50 obese, BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)) parturients scheduled for cesarean delivery were divided into ultrasound and control groups. Subarachnoid block was performed with prepuncture ultrasound examination in lean parturients (group 1, n = 25) and in obese parturients (group 2, n = 25), and subarachnoid block was performed without prepuncture ultrasound examination in lean parturients (group 3, n = 25) and in obese parturients (group 4, n = 25). The number of puncture attempts and puncture levels were recorded.
RESULTS: A lower number of puncture attempts and fewer puncture levels were detected in ultrasound (US) groups (p < 0.001). First attempt success rate under US guidance was 92 % in comparison to 44 % using a conventional technique in obese parturients (p < 0.001). In 52 % of the lean patients and in 54.2 % of the obese patients, the intercristal line was at the L3-L4 and at the L2-L3 interspace, respectively. The duration of spinal procedure was shorter in US groups (22 vs. 52 s, p = 0.031). We found a high correlation between ultrasound and needle depth (r = 0.709, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We found a high level of success in the prepuncture ultrasound-determined insertion point. The ultrasound imaging technique can be a reliable guide to facilitate spinal anesthesia, especially in obese parturients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24141882     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-013-1726-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  12 in total

1.  An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level.

Authors:  G Furness; M P Reilly; S Kuchi
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Could ultrasonography be used by an anaesthetist to identify a specified lumbar interspace before spinal anaesthesia?

Authors:  M J Watson; S Evans; J M Thorp
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  Ultrasound-facilitated epidurals and spinals in obstetrics.

Authors:  Jose Carlos Almeida Carvalho
Journal:  Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2008-03

4.  Emergency physicians can easily obtain ultrasound images of anatomical landmarks relevant to lumbar puncture.

Authors:  Robinson M Ferre; Timothy W Sweeney
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  The intercristal line determined by palpation is not a reliable anatomical landmark for neuraxial anesthesia.

Authors:  Clarita B Margarido; Rafeek Mikhael; Cristian Arzola; Mrinalini Balki; Jose C A Carvalho
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Paramedian access to the epidural space: the optimum window for ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  T Grau; R W Leipold; J Horter; R Conradi; E O Martin; J Motsch
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.452

7.  Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace.

Authors:  C R Broadbent; W B Maxwell; R Ferrie; D J Wilson; M Gawne-Cain; R Russell
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Ultrasonographic control of the puncture level for lumbar neuraxial block in obstetric anaesthesia.

Authors:  H Schlotterbeck; R Schaeffer; W A Dow; Y Touret; S Bailey; P Diemunsch
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Real-time ultrasonic observation of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia.

Authors:  T Grau; R W Leipold; S Fatehi; E Martin; J Motsch
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  ASRA Practice Advisory on Neurologic Complications in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.

Authors:  Joseph M Neal; Christopher M Bernards; Admir Hadzic; James R Hebl; Quinn H Hogan; Terese T Horlocker; Lorri A Lee; James P Rathmell; Eric J Sorenson; Santhanam Suresh; Denise J Wedel
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.288

View more
  20 in total

1.  Would adopting a revised landmark rule for the spinal level of the iliac crests improve the accuracy of lumbar level identification?

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Felisha Truong
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2019-04

Review 2.  Lumbar Ultrasonography for Obstetric Neuraxial Blocks: Sonoanatomy and Literature Review.

Authors:  Tülay Şahin; Onur Balaban
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-08-01

3.  Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Adult Lumbar Puncture: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Authors:  Nilam J Soni; Ricardo Franco-Sadud; Ketino Kobaidze; Daniel Schnobrich; Gerard Salame; Joshua Lenchus; Venkat Kalidindi; Michael J Mader; Elizabeth K Haro; Ria Dancel; Joel Cho; Loretta Grikis; Brian P Lucas
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 4.  Ultrasound-facilitated neuraxial anaesthesia in obstetrics.

Authors:  A Sadeghi; R Patel; J C A Carvalho
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2021-08-19

5.  Preprocedural ultrasound examination versus manual palpation for thoracic epidural catheter insertion.

Authors:  Ahmed M Hasanin; Ali M Mokhtar; Shereen M Amin; Ahmed A Sayed
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

6.  Modified paramedian versus conventional paramedian technique in the residency training: an observational study.

Authors:  Shih-Hong Chen; Shiou-Sheng Chen; Chao-Lun Lai; Fang-Ying Su; I-Shiang Tzeng; Li-Kuei Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Systematic review and meta-analyses of the difference between the spinal level of the palpated and imaged iliac crests.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Felisha Truong
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2017-08

8.  Comparison of the time taken for subarachnoid block using ultrasound-guided method versus landmark technique for cesarean section - A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  B Gayathri; C K Swetha Ramani; Karthika Urkavalan; A Pushparani; A Rajendran
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-15

Review 9.  Managing anesthesia for cesarean section in obese patients: current perspectives.

Authors:  Agnes M Lamon; Ashraf S Habib
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2016-08-16

10.  Comparison of landmark versus pre-procedural ultrasonography-assisted midline approach for identification of subarachnoid space in elective caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sangeeta Dhanger; Stalin Vinayagam; Bhavani Vaidhyanathan; Idhuyya Joseph Rajesh; Debendra Kumar Tripathy
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.