Nilam J Soni1,2, Ricardo Franco-Sadud3,4, Ketino Kobaidze5, Daniel Schnobrich6, Gerard Salame7, Joshua Lenchus8, Venkat Kalidindi9, Michael J Mader1,2, Elizabeth K Haro1,2, Ria Dancel10,11, Joel Cho12, Loretta Grikis13, Brian P Lucas14,15. 1. Division of General and Hospital Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. 2. Section of Hospital Medicine, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas. 3. Division of Hospital Medicine, Naples Community Hospital, Naples, Florida. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida. 5. Division of Hospital Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 6. Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Hospital Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 7. Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado and Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado. 8. Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. 9. HCA Physician Services, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. 10. Division of Hospital Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 11. Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 12. Department of Hospital Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, San Francisco, California. 13. White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont. 14. Medicine Service, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont. 15. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Abstract
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: When ultrasound equipment is available, along with providers who are appropriately trained to use it, we recommend that ultrasound guidance should be used for site selection of lumbar puncture to reduce the number of needle insertion attempts and needle redirections and increase the overall procedure success rates, especially in patients who are obese or have difficult-to-palpate landmarks. We recommend that ultrasound should be used to more accurately identify the lumbar spine level than physical examination in both obese and nonobese patients. We suggest using ultrasound for selecting and marking a needle insertion site just before performing lumbar puncture in either a lateral decubitus or sitting position. The patient should remain in the same position after marking the needle insertion site. We recommend that a low-frequency transducer, preferably a curvilinear array transducer, should be used to evaluate the lumbar spine and mark a needle insertion site. A high-frequency linear array transducer may be used in nonobese patients. We recommend that ultrasound should be used to map the lumbar spine, starting at the level of the sacrum and sliding the transducer cephalad, sequentially identifying the lumbar spine interspaces. We recommend that ultrasound should be used in a transverse plane to mark the midline of the lumbar spine and in a longitudinal plane to mark the interspinous spaces. The intersection of these two lines marks the needle insertion site. We recommend that ultrasound should be used during a preprocedural evaluation to measure the distance from the skin surface to the ligamentum flavum from a longitudinal paramedian view to estimate the needle insertion depth and ensure that a spinal needle of adequate length is used. We recommend that novices should undergo simulation-based training, where available, before attempting ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture on actual patients. We recommend that training in ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture should be adapted based on prior ultrasound experience, as learning curves will vary. We recommend that novice providers should be supervised when performing ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture before performing the procedure independently on patients.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: When ultrasound equipment is available, along with providers who are appropriately trained to use it, we recommend that ultrasound guidance should be used for site selection of lumbar puncture to reduce the number of needle insertion attempts and needle redirections and increase the overall procedure success rates, especially in patients who are obese or have difficult-to-palpate landmarks. We recommend that ultrasound should be used to more accurately identify the lumbar spine level than physical examination in both obese and nonobese patients. We suggest using ultrasound for selecting and marking a needle insertion site just before performing lumbar puncture in either a lateral decubitus or sitting position. The patient should remain in the same position after marking the needle insertion site. We recommend that a low-frequency transducer, preferably a curvilinear array transducer, should be used to evaluate the lumbar spine and mark a needle insertion site. A high-frequency linear array transducer may be used in nonobese patients. We recommend that ultrasound should be used to map the lumbar spine, starting at the level of the sacrum and sliding the transducer cephalad, sequentially identifying the lumbar spine interspaces. We recommend that ultrasound should be used in a transverse plane to mark the midline of the lumbar spine and in a longitudinal plane to mark the interspinous spaces. The intersection of these two lines marks the needle insertion site. We recommend that ultrasound should be used during a preprocedural evaluation to measure the distance from the skin surface to the ligamentum flavum from a longitudinal paramedian view to estimate the needle insertion depth and ensure that a spinal needle of adequate length is used. We recommend that novices should undergo simulation-based training, where available, before attempting ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture on actual patients. We recommend that training in ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture should be adapted based on prior ultrasound experience, as learning curves will vary. We recommend that novice providers should be supervised when performing ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture before performing the procedure independently on patients.
Authors: Zsuzsanna Keri; Devin Sydor; Tamas Ungi; Matthew S Holden; Robert McGraw; Parvin Mousavi; Daniel P Borschneck; Gabor Fichtinger; Melanie Jaeger Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Paolo Perna; Antonio Gioia; Riccardo Ragazzi; Carlo A Volta; Massimo Innamorato Journal: Minerva Anestesiol Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 3.051
Authors: Robert Nathanson; Minh-Phuong T Le; Kevin C Proud; Charles M LoPresti; Elizabeth K Haro; Michael J Mader; Jane O'Rorke; Patricia I Wathen; Nilam J Soni Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Mamdouh Souleymane; Rajkumar Rajendram; Naveed Mahmood; Amro M T Ghazi; Yousuf M S Kharal; Arif Hussain Journal: Ultrasound J Date: 2021-04-13
Authors: Harald Hampel; Leslie M Shaw; Paul Aisen; Christopher Chen; Alberto Lleó; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Atsushi Iwata; Masahito Yamada; Takeshi Ikeuchi; Jianping Jia; Huali Wang; Charlotte E Teunissen; Elaine Peskind; Kaj Blennow; Jeffrey Cummings; Andrea Vergallo Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 16.655
Authors: David H Lynch; Hillary B Spangler; Jason R Franz; Rebecca L Krupenevich; Hoon Kim; Daniel Nissman; Janet Zhang; Yuan-Yuan Li; Susan Sumner; John A Batsis Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-03-26 Impact factor: 5.717