Literature DB >> 29090262

Conus medullaris trauma: is there a greater risk in parturients?

Julie Verkooijen1, Hilde Coppejans1, Els Mertens1, Vera Saldien1, Marcel Vercauteren1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is some evidence that anaesthetists often perform neuraxial blocks at a higher lumbar interspace than intended. It may be questioned whether parturients are at greater risk for neurological damage when the dura is perforated at a more cephalad interspace than L2-L3.
METHODS: Thirty-six patients scheduled for elective Caesarean delivery under CSE anaesthesia were selected for study. Using a B-D Durasafe Adjustable needle combination, the skin-to-epidural distance and the width of the epidural space were measured and matched with 36 female patients undergoing the same anaesthetic technique for orthopaedic procedures.
RESULTS: Pregnant patients had a higher bodyweight (77 vs. 67 kg, p = 0.007) than those scheduled for orthopaedic surgery. The skin-to-epidural distance was similar in both groups (5.3 vs. 5.1 cm, p = 0.3). The width of the epidural space was 1.1 mm larger in parturients (8.2 vs. 7.1 mm, p = 0.04). More patients in this group had tip-to-tip distances exceeding 10 mm (25 vs. 12%).
CONCLUSION: The greater epidural space or tip-to-tip distance between the epidural and spinal needle points in term parturients results in a lower margin of safety with respect to the distance from the dura to spinal cord or conus medullaris. Puncturing the correct interspace is, therefore, of crucial importance in pregnant patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaesthesia; complications; conus medullaris; epidural; neurological; spinal

Year:  2017        PMID: 29090262      PMCID: PMC5642849          DOI: 10.21454/rjaic.7518.242.ver

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 2392-7518


  14 in total

1.  Posterior epidural space depth: safety of the loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques.

Authors:  V L Hoffmann; M P Vercauteren; J P Vreugde; G H Hans; H C Coppejans; H A Adriaensen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Logic in the safe practice of spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  F Reynolds
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Keeping in the Reynolds zone.

Authors:  David Bogod
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.603

4.  A clinical measure of the posterior epidural space depth.

Authors:  B K Bevacqua; T Haas; F Brand
Journal:  Reg Anesth       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

5.  Spread of spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine: influence of the vertebral interspace and speed of injection.

Authors:  K W Chin; N M Chin; M K Chin
Journal:  Med J Malaysia       Date:  1994-06

6.  Damage to the conus medullaris following spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  F Reynolds
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace.

Authors:  C R Broadbent; W B Maxwell; R Ferrie; D J Wilson; M Gawne-Cain; R Russell
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Spread of spinal anaesthesia with plain 0.5% bupivacaine: influence of the vertebral interspace used for injection.

Authors:  M Tuominen; T Taivainen; P H Rosenberg
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: an ultrasound comparison of two different landmark techniques.

Authors:  K Kallidaikurichi Srinivasan; M Deighan; L Crowley; K McKeating
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.603

10.  Ultrasonographic control of the puncture level for lumbar neuraxial block in obstetric anaesthesia.

Authors:  H Schlotterbeck; R Schaeffer; W A Dow; Y Touret; S Bailey; P Diemunsch
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.