Literature DB >> 28928494

Systematic review and meta-analyses of the difference between the spinal level of the palpated and imaged iliac crests.

Robert Cooperstein1, Felisha Truong1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to undertake a systematic review of the literature to determine and compare, for patient sub-groups, the spinal level of the iliac crests as commonly measured through manual palpation and radiographic imaging procedures.
METHODS: Relevant citations were retrieved by searching the PubMed, ICL, CINAHL, AMED, Osteopathic Research Web, OstMed, and MANTIS biomedical databases, and included articles were rated for quality. Search terms included Tuffier*, intercristal line, intercrestal line, Jacoby's line, lumbar spine, lumbar landmark, pelvic landmark, palpation, and TL (Tuffier's Line). Meta-analyses were performed on the full datasets as well as subsets based on various patient demographics.
RESULTS: Original search strategies retrieved 1301 citations; 47 articles were used for qualitative synthesis and 31 for meta-analyses. Across these studies imaged crests were found to be most consistent with and closest to the L4-5 interspace in females and L4 spinous process in males. In comparison, the spinal level for the palpated crests was nearest to the L3-4 interspace in males and females. The palpated crest line was 0.7 levels cephalad to the imaged crest line in males, and 1.0 levels cephalad to the imaged line in females. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: During manual palpation, the examiner's fingers contact soft tissue overlying the iliac crests, thereby usually identifying the L3-4 spinal level rather than the assumed L4-5 level. Palpating iliac crests to guide anesthetic injections or manual therapy without appreciating these findings can be hazardous or lead to suboptimal patient care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomic landmarks; chiropractic; ilium; lumbar vertebrae; palpation; radiography

Year:  2017        PMID: 28928494      PMCID: PMC5596973     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc        ISSN: 0008-3194


  47 in total

1.  A scale of methodological quality for clinical studies of radiologic examinations.

Authors:  L Arrivé; R Renard; F Carrat; A Belkacem; H Dahan; P Le Hir; L Monnier-Cholley; J M Tubiana
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The interlaminar and the narrowest distances at the L3/4 and L4/5 interspinous spaces and location of the intercrestal line in Thai cadavers.

Authors:  Kajorn Lakchayapakorn; Nadthaganya Suwanlikhid
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2014-08

3.  The use of pMRI to validate the identification of palpated bony landmarks.

Authors:  Kay Cooper; Lyndsay Alexander; Elizabeth Hancock; Francis W Smith
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2012-11-04

4.  The intercristal line determined by palpation is not a reliable anatomical landmark for neuraxial anesthesia.

Authors:  Clarita B Margarido; Rafeek Mikhael; Cristian Arzola; Mrinalini Balki; Jose C A Carvalho
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  [Evaluation of the iliac crest as anatomic landmark for spinal anaesthesia in pregnant women].

Authors:  A Kettani; R Tachinante; A Tazi
Journal:  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim       Date:  2006-03-29

6.  Reliability of Tuffier's line as an anatomic landmark.

Authors:  Karen T Snider; James W Kribs; Eric J Snider; Brian F Degenhardt; Allison Bukowski; Jane C Johnson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Ultrasonographic control of the puncture level for lumbar neuraxial block in obstetric anaesthesia.

Authors:  H Schlotterbeck; R Schaeffer; W A Dow; Y Touret; S Bailey; P Diemunsch
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups?

Authors:  D Gallagher; M Visser; D Sepúlveda; R N Pierson; T Harris; S B Heymsfield
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  A randomized controlled trial of preinsertion ultrasound guidance for spinal anaesthesia in pregnancy: outcomes among obese and lean parturients: ultrasound for spinal anesthesia in pregnancy.

Authors:  Tulay Sahin; Onur Balaban; Levent Sahin; Mine Solak; Kamil Toker
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  The location of the inferior angle of the scapula in relation to the spine in the upright position: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Michael Haneline; Morgan Young
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2015-02-27
View more
  6 in total

1.  Would adopting a revised landmark rule for the spinal level of the iliac crests improve the accuracy of lumbar level identification?

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Felisha Truong
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2019-04

2.  Safety of dry needling to the upper lumbar spine: a pilot cadaver study.

Authors:  C J Mansfield; M Harr; M Briggs; J Onate; L C Boucher
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-12-25

3.  A review of 571 radiographs on Tuffier's inter-cristal line and its' application in lumbar spinal surgery.

Authors:  Ahmed Chowdhury; Himanshu Sharma
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

4.  Morphological parameters of fourth lumbar spinous process palpation: a three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography.

Authors:  Qi Feng; Lei Zhang; Mengyao Zhang; Youliang Wen; Ping Zhang; Yi Wang; Yan Zeng; Junqiu Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Accuracy of Tuffier's Line Identification by Palpation Method: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study Among Obese, Pregnant and Control Groups.

Authors:  Mehreen Malik; Samina Ismail
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2019-10-17

6.  Development of a fully automatic deep learning system for L3 selection and body composition assessment on computed tomography.

Authors:  Jiyeon Ha; Taeyong Park; Hong-Kyu Kim; Youngbin Shin; Yousun Ko; Dong Wook Kim; Yu Sub Sung; Jiwoo Lee; Su Jung Ham; Seungwoo Khang; Heeryeol Jeong; Kyoyeong Koo; Jeongjin Lee; Kyung Won Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.