Literature DB >> 29806518

Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences.

Michelle L McGowan1,2, Cynthia A Prows1, Melissa DeJonckheere3, William B Brinkman1,2, Lisa Vaughn1,2, Melanie F Myers1,2.   

Abstract

Opportunities to participate in genomic sequencing studies, as well as recommendations to screen for variants in 59 medically actionable genes anytime clinical genomic sequencing is performed, indicate adolescents will increasingly be involved in decisions about learning secondary findings from genome sequencing. However, how adolescents want to be involved in such decisions is unknown. We conducted five focus groups with adolescents (2) and parents (3) to learn their decisional preferences about return of genomic research results to adolescents. Discussions about decisional preferences centered around three themes: feelings about receiving genomic risk information, adolescent involvement and capacity to participate in decision-making, and recommendations for parental versus collaborative decision-making. We address the contested space between parental duties to act in their children's best interests when choosing which results to return and adolescents' desires to make autonomous decisions. A collaborative decision-making approach is recommended for obtaining consent from adolescents and their parents for genome sequencing research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescent preferences; decision aid; focus group; genetic testing; genome sequencing; participant preferences; pediatrics; return of individual genomic research results; return of results

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29806518      PMCID: PMC6146016          DOI: 10.1177/1556264618776613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  51 in total

Review 1.  Predictive genetic testing in minors for late-onset conditions: a chronological and analytical review of the ethical arguments.

Authors:  Cara Mand; Lynn Gillam; Martin B Delatycki; Rony E Duncan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies.

Authors:  Denise F Polit; Cheryl Tatano Beck
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 5.837

3.  Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan; Jennifer R Fishman; Marcie A Lambrix
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2010-09-01

4.  Psychosocial Adjustment and Perceived Risk Among Adolescent Girls From Families With BRCA1/2 or Breast Cancer History.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Lisa A Schwartz; Brian L Egleston; Dare Henry-Moss; Susan M Domchek; Mary B Daly; Lisa Tuchman; Cynthia Moore; Paula K Rauch; Rebecca Shorter; Kelsey Karpink; Colleen Burke Sands
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The return of research results to participants: pilot questionnaire of adolescents and parents of children with cancer.

Authors:  C V Fernandez; D Santor; C Weijer; C Strahlendorf; A Moghrabi; R Pentz; J Gao; E Kodish
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Julia Crouch; Seema M Jamal; Holly K Tabor; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Adolescents' preferences regarding disclosure of incidental findings in genomic sequencing that are not medically actionable in childhood.

Authors:  Sophia B Hufnagel; Lisa J Martin; Amy Cassedy; Robert J Hopkin; Armand H Matheny Antommaria
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.

Authors:  J C Sapp; D Dong; C Stark; L E Ivey; G Hooker; L G Biesecker; B B Biesecker
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 9.  Effects of genetic risk information on children's psychosocial wellbeing: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Benjamin S Wilfond; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Defining and managing incidental findings in genetic and genomic practice.

Authors:  Shiri Shkedi-Rafid; Sandi Dheensa; Gillian Crawford; Angela Fenwick; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 6.318

View more
  13 in total

1.  Adolescents' and Parents' Genomic Testing Decisions: Associations With Age, Race, and Sex.

Authors:  Melanie F Myers; Lisa J Martin; Cynthia A Prows
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Mwenza Blell; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Lorraine Cowley; Stephanie O M Dyke; Clara Gaff; Robert Green; Alison Hall; Amber L Johns; Bartha M Knoppers; Stephanie Mulrine; Christine Patch; Eva Winkler; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Perspectives and preferences regarding genomic secondary findings in underrepresented prenatal and pediatric populations: A mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  Shannon Rego; Hannah Hoban; Simon Outram; Astrid N Zamora; Flavia Chen; Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil; Beatriz Anguiano; Matthew Norstad; Tiffany Yip; Billie Lianoglou; Teresa N Sparks; Mary E Norton; Barbara A Koenig; Anne M Slavotinek; Sara L Ackerman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 8.864

4.  Ethical Considerations on Pediatric Genetic Testing Results in Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Shibani Kanungo; Jayne Barr; Parker Crutchfield; Casey Fealko; Neelkamal Soares
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Decisional conflict among adolescents and parents making decisions about genomic sequencing results.

Authors:  Preethi Raghuram Pillai; Cynthia A Prows; Lisa J Martin; Melanie F Myers
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 6.  Views on genomic research result delivery methods and informed consent: a review.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Development of a measure of genome sequencing knowledge for young people: The kids-KOGS.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Bao S Loe; Chris Sidey-Gibbons; Christine Patch; Lyn S Chitty; Saskia C Sanderson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  Using Personal Genomic Data within Primary Care: A Bioinformatics Approach to Pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Rick Overkleeft; Judith Tommel; Andrea W M Evers; Johan T den Dunnen; Marco Roos; Marie-José Hoefmans; Walter E Schrader; Jesse J Swen; Mattijs E Numans; Elisa J F Houwink
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Impact of Genetic Testing for Cardiomyopathy on Emotional Well-Being and Family Dynamics: A Study of Parents and Adolescents.

Authors:  Priyanka Ahimaz; Maya Sabatello; Min Qian; Aijin Wang; Erin M Miller; Ashley Parrott; Ashwin K Lal; Kathryn C Chatfield; Joseph W Rossano; Stephanie M Ware; John J Parent; Paul Kantor; Lisa Yue; Julia Wynn; Teresa M Lee; Linda J Addonizio; Paul S Appelbaum; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2021-07-13

10.  Pediatric reporting of genomic results study (PROGRESS): a mixed-methods, longitudinal, observational cohort study protocol to explore disclosure of actionable adult- and pediatric-onset genomic variants to minors and their parents.

Authors:  Juliann M Savatt; Jennifer K Wagner; Steven Joffe; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Marc S Williams; Angela R Bradbury; F Daniel Davis; Julie Hergenrather; Yirui Hu; Melissa A Kelly; H Lester Kirchner; Michelle N Meyer; Jessica Mozersky; Sean M O'Dell; Josie Pervola; Andrea Seeley; Amy C Sturm; Adam H Buchanan
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.