Literature DB >> 20531440

A qualitative study exploring genetic counsellors' experiences of counselling children.

Fiona Ulph1, James Leong, Cris Glazebrook, Ellen Townsend.   

Abstract

The identification of healthy carriers by newborn screening programmes raises questions about how and when the carrier results will be conveyed to child. There is currently a lack of information concerning how best to convey carrier information to children. This is a serious gap in the literature and practice. This study examined genetic counsellors' experiences of counselling children to explore how to support and inform children about their carrier result. Practising members of the United Kingdom (UK) Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors took part in semi-structured telephone interviews. Respondents described the communication process and identified barriers and facilitators of communication. Age, illness experience and maturity were variously discussed as facilitators; all of which are integral to psychological theories of children's understanding of illness. Adaptive family communication, school tuition and educational materials were also seen as influencing counselling efficacy. Relevant materials that children could keep were also seen as important to enhance children's autonomy. Yet, such resources were rare, constituting a barrier to communication. Counsellors reported communication was further impeded by maladaptive family communication and resistance from children to engaging in counselling. By exploring the facilitators and barriers inherent in communicating genetic information to children, guidance can be offered to counsellors, researchers and parents. This study indicates that some factors (eg illness experiences) previously identified by psychological theories may act in complex ways within this setting. Importantly, the factors identified as being most influential when communicating with children about genetics are amenable to change through interventions, support and training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20531440      PMCID: PMC2987449          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  35 in total

1.  Constructing an account by contrast in counselling for childhood genetic testing.

Authors:  Srikant Sarangi; Angus Clarke
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Genetic counseling for pregnant adolescents.

Authors:  T Peters-Brown; L Fry-Mehltretter
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  BRCA1 in the family: a case description of the psychological implications.

Authors:  A C DudokdeWit; A Tibben; P G Frets; E J Meijers-Heijboer; P Devilee; J G Klijn; J C Oosterwijk; M F Niermeijer
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1997-07-11

Review 4.  Rigour and qualitative research.

Authors:  N Mays; C Pope
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-08

5.  A private view of heterozygosity: eight-year follow-up study on carriers of the Tay-Sachs gene detected by high school screening in Montreal.

Authors:  S Zeesman; C L Clow; L Cartier; C R Scriver
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1984-08

6.  Attitudes toward the genetic testing of children among adults in a Utah-based kindred tested for a BRCA1 mutation.

Authors:  H A Hamann; R T Croyle; V L Venne; B J Baty; K R Smith; J R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-05-01

7.  What are blood counts? A computer-assisted program for pediatric patients.

Authors:  M Petersen
Journal:  Pediatr Nurs       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb

8.  Attitudes regarding predictive genetic testing in minors: a survey of European clinical geneticists.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Tom Goffin; Herman Nys; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

9.  Family communication between children and their parents about inherited genetic conditions: a meta-synthesis of the research.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Jane Coad; Gill M Plumridge; Paramjit Gill; Peter Farndon
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Adolescents and genetic testing: what do they think about it?

Authors:  Asaff Harel; Dianne Abuelo; Alessandra Kazura
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.012

View more
  5 in total

1.  Family Communication in Inherited Cardiovascular Conditions in Ireland.

Authors:  Sinead Whyte; Andrew Green; Marion McAllister; Hannah Shipman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A qualitative study to explore how professionals in the United Kingdom make decisions to test children for a sickle cell carrier status.

Authors:  Melissa Noke; Sarah Peters; Alison Wearden; Fiona Ulph
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Informing children of their newborn screening carrier result for sickle cell or cystic fibrosis: qualitative study of parents' intentions, views and support needs.

Authors:  Fiona Ulph; Tim Cullinan; Nadeem Qureshi; Joe Kai
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Developing an intervention to facilitate family communication about inherited genetic conditions, and training genetic counsellors in its delivery.

Authors:  Ivan Eisler; Matthew Ellison; Frances Flinter; Jo Grey; Suzanne Hutchison; Carole Jackson; Louise Longworth; Rhona MacLeod; Marion McAllister; Alison Metcalfe; Trevor Murrells; Christine Patch; Stuart Pritchard; Glenn Robert; Emma Rowland; Fiona Ulph
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Genomic Health Literacy Interventions in Pediatrics: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Aarushi Gupta; Joseph A Cafazzo; Maarten J IJzerman; Joost F Swart; Sebastiaan Vastert; Nico M Wulffraat; Susanne Benseler; Deborah Marshall; Rae Yeung; Marinka Twilt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.