Literature DB >> 18189567

A state space model for cochlear mechanics.

Stephen J Elliott1, Emery M Ku, Ben Lineton.   

Abstract

The stability of a linear model of the active cochlea is difficult to determine from its calculated frequency response alone. A state space model of the cochlea is presented, which includes a discretized set of general micromechanical elements coupled via the cochlear fluid. The stability of this time domain model can be easily determined in the linear case, and the same framework used to simulate the time domain response of nonlinear models. Examples of stable and unstable behavior are illustrated using the active micromechanical model of Neely and Kim. The stability of this active cochlea is extremely sensitive to abrupt spatial inhomogeneities, while smoother inhomogeneities are less likely to cause instability. The model is a convenient tool for investigating the presence of instabilities due to random spatial inhomogeneities. The number of unstable poles is found to rise sharply with the relative amplitude of the inhomogeneities up to a few percent, but to be significantly reduced if the spatial variation is smoothed. In a saturating nonlinear model, such instabilities generate limit cycles that are thought to produce spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. An illustrative time domain simulation is presented, which shows how an unstable model evolves into a limit cycle, distributed along the cochlea.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18189567     DOI: 10.1121/1.2783125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Distortion products and backward-traveling waves in nonlinear active models of the cochlea.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Teresa Botti; Daniele Bertaccini; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  An active oscillator model describes the statistics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Florian Fruth; Frank Jülicher; Benjamin Lindner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Relation Between Cochlear Mechanics and Performance of Temporal Fine Structure-Based Tasks.

Authors:  Sho Otsuka; Shigeto Furukawa; Shimpei Yamagishi; Koich Hirota; Makio Kashino
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-08

4.  Basilar membrane and tectorial membrane stiffness in the CBA/CaJ mouse.

Authors:  I U Teudt; C P Richter
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-28

5.  Forward and Reverse Waves: Modeling Distortion Products in the Intracochlear Fluid Pressure.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Constraints imposed by zero-crossing invariance on cochlear models with two mechanical degrees of freedom.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Christopher A Shera; Alessandro Altoè; Arturo Moleti
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The cochlea as a smart structure.

Authors:  Stephen J Elliott; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Smart Mater Struct       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.585

Review 8.  Modelling cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Guangjian Ni; Stephen J Elliott; Mohammad Ayat; Paul D Teal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Analytical and numerical modeling of the hearing system: Advances towards the assessment of hearing damage.

Authors:  Annalisa De Paolis; Marom Bikson; Jeremy T Nelson; J Alexander de Ru; Mark Packer; Luis Cardoso
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Characterization of bone-implant fixation using modal analysis: application to a press-fit implant model.

Authors:  P Swider; G Guérin; Joergen Baas; Kjeld Søballe; Joan E Bechtold
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.