Literature DB >> 31590512

Constraints imposed by zero-crossing invariance on cochlear models with two mechanical degrees of freedom.

Renata Sisto1, Christopher A Shera2, Alessandro Altoè2, Arturo Moleti3.   

Abstract

The zero crossings of basilar-membrane (BM) responses to clicks are nearly independent of stimulus intensity. This work explores the constraints that this invariance imposes on one-dimensional nonlinear cochlear models with two degrees of freedom (2DoF). The locations of the poles and zeros of the BM admittance, calculated for a set of linear models in which the strength of the active force is progressively decreased, provides a playground for evaluating the behavior of a corresponding nonlinear model at increasing stimulus levels. Mathematical constraints on the model parameters are derived by requiring that the poles of the admittance move horizontally in the s-plane as the active force is varied. These constraints ensure approximate zero-crossing invariance over a wide stimulus level range in a nonlinear model in which the active force varies as a function of the local instantaneous BM displacement and velocity. Two different 2DoF models are explored, each capable of reproducing the main qualitative characteristics of the BM response to tones (i.e., the tall and broad activity pattern at low stimulus levels, the large gain dynamics, and the partial decoupling between gain and phase). In each model, the motions of the two masses are compared with response data from animal experiments.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31590512      PMCID: PMC6756920          DOI: 10.1121/1.5126514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Different models of the active cochlea, and how to implement them in the state-space formalism.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Nicolo Paternoster; Teresa Botti; Daniele Bertaccini
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Fast cochlear amplification with slow outer hair cells.

Authors:  Timothy K Lu; Serhii Zhak; Peter Dallos; Rahul Sarpeshkar
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  A state space model for cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Stephen J Elliott; Emery M Ku; Ben Lineton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effect of tectorial membrane and basilar membrane longitudinal coupling in cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Julien Meaud; Karl Grosh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Otoacoustic emissions in time-domain solutions of nonlinear non-local cochlear models.

Authors:  Arturo Moleti; Nicolò Paternoster; Daniele Bertaccini; Renata Sisto; Filippo Sanjust
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Active control of waves in a cochlear model with subpartitions.

Authors:  R S Chadwick; E K Dimitriadis; K H Iwasa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Noninvasive in vivo imaging reveals differences between tectorial membrane and basilar membrane traveling waves in the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Hee Yoon Lee; Patrick D Raphael; Jesung Park; Audrey K Ellerbee; Brian E Applegate; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Can shape deformations of the organ of Corti influence the travelling wave in the cochlea?

Authors:  E de Boer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Two-Dimensional Cochlear Micromechanics Measured In Vivo Demonstrate Radial Tuning within the Mouse Organ of Corti.

Authors:  Hee Yoon Lee; Patrick D Raphael; Anping Xia; Jinkyung Kim; Nicolas Grillet; Brian E Applegate; Audrey K Ellerbee Bowden; John S Oghalai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Dynamics of cochlear nonlinearity: Automatic gain control or instantaneous damping?

Authors:  Alessandro Altoè; Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.