Literature DB >> 23148128

The cochlea as a smart structure.

Stephen J Elliott1, Christopher A Shera.   

Abstract

The cochlea is part of the inner ear and its mechanical response provides us with many aspects of our amazingly sensitive and selective hearing. The human cochlea is a coiled tube, with two main fluid chambers running along its length, separated by a 35 mm-long flexible partition that has its own internal dynamics. A dispersive wave can propagate along the cochlea due to the interaction between the inertia of the fluid and the dynamics of the partition. This partition includes about 12 000 outer hair cells, which have different structures, on a micrometre and a nanometre scale, and act both as motional sensors and as motional actuators. The local feedback action of all these cells amplifies the motion inside the inner ear by more than 40 dB at low sound pressure levels. The feedback loops become saturated at higher sound pressure levels, however, so that the feedback gain is reduced, leading to a compression of the dynamic range in the cochlear amplifier. This helps the sensory cells, with a dynamic range of only about 30 dB, to respond to sounds with a dynamic range of more than 120 dB. The active and nonlinear nature of the dynamics within the cochlea give rise to a number of other phenomena, such as otoacoustic emissions, which can be used as a diagnostic test for hearing problems in newborn children, for example. In this paper we view the mechanical action of the cochlea as a smart structure. In particular a simplified wave model of the cochlear dynamics is reviewed that represents its essential features. This can be used to predict the motion along the cochlea when the cochlea is passive, at high levels, and also the effect of the cochlear amplifier, at low levels.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23148128      PMCID: PMC3494087          DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/21/6/064001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Smart Mater Struct        ISSN: 0964-1726            Impact factor:   3.585


  27 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

3.  Basilar membrane nonlinearity and its influence on auditory nerve rate-intensity functions.

Authors:  G K Yates
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The cochlear compromise.

Authors:  G Zweig; R Lipes; J R Pierce
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A mechano-electro-acoustical model for the cochlea: response to acoustic stimuli.

Authors:  Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Niranjan V Deo; Karl Grosh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A state space model for cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Stephen J Elliott; Emery M Ku; Ben Lineton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A hardware cochlear nonlinear preprocessing model with active feedback.

Authors:  E Zwicker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Basilar membrane measurements and the travelling wave.

Authors:  B M Johnstone; R Patuzzi; G K Yates
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces.

Authors:  C D Geisler; C Sang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Mathematical modeling of cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  S T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Onset kinetics of noise-induced purinergic adaptation of the 'cochlear amplifier'.

Authors:  Jennie M E Cederholm; Allen F Ryan; Gary D Housley
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 3.765

Review 2.  Modelling cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Guangjian Ni; Stephen J Elliott; Mohammad Ayat; Paul D Teal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Analytical and numerical modeling of the hearing system: Advances towards the assessment of hearing damage.

Authors:  Annalisa De Paolis; Marom Bikson; Jeremy T Nelson; J Alexander de Ru; Mark Packer; Luis Cardoso
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  ATP-gated ion channels mediate adaptation to elevated sound levels.

Authors:  Gary D Housley; Rachel Morton-Jones; Srdjan M Vlajkovic; Ravindra S Telang; Vinthiya Paramananthasivam; Sherif F Tadros; Ann Chi Yan Wong; Kristina E Froud; Jennie M E Cederholm; Yogeesan Sivakumaran; Peerawuth Snguanwongchai; Baljit S Khakh; Debra A Cockayne; Peter R Thorne; Allen F Ryan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Non-invasive biophysical measurement of travelling waves in the insect inner ear.

Authors:  Fabio A Sarria-S; Benedict D Chivers; Carl D Soulsbury; Fernando Montealegre-Z
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Cochlea-inspired design of an acoustic rainbow sensor with a smoothly varying frequency response.

Authors:  Angelis Karlos; Stephen J Elliott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A Novel Frequency Selectivity Approach Based on Travelling Wave Propagation in Mechanoluminescence Basilar Membrane for Artificial Cochlea.

Authors:  Yooil Kim; Ji-Sik Kim; Gi-Woo Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.