Literature DB >> 18183377

The effect of exposure to asynchronous audio, visual, and tactile stimulus combinations on the perception of simultaneity.

Vanessa Harrar1, Laurence R Harris.   

Abstract

Information about an event takes different amounts of time to be processed depending on which sensory system the event activates. However, despite the variations in processing time for lights and sounds, the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) for briefly presented audio/visual stimuli is usually close to true simultaneity. Here we confirm that the simultaneity constancy mechanism that achieves this for audio/visual stimulus pairs is adaptable, and extend the investigation to other multimodal combinations. We measured the PSS and just noticeable differences (JNDs) for temporal order judgements for three stimulus combinations (sound/light, sound/touch, and light/touch) before and after repeated exposure to each one of these pairs presented with a 100 ms asynchrony (i.e., nine adapt-test combinations). Only the perception of simultaneity of the sound/light pair was affected by our exposure regime: the PSS shifted after exposure to either a temporally staggered sound/light or light/touch pair, and the JND decreased following exposure to a sound/touch pair. No changes were found in the PSSs or JNDs of sound/touch or light/touch pairs following exposure to any of the three time-staggered combinations. Participants' reaction times (RT) to the three stimuli were also tested before and after each adaptation exposure. In general, exposure did not affect attention or processing time; the only change in RTs (of the 9 tested) was an increased RT for light following exposure to a sound/light pair with light leading. We suggest that the neural correlates of multisensory sound/light processing are resynchronised by a separate, more flexible simultaneity constancy mechanism than the light/touch or the sound/touch simultaneity processing systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18183377     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1253-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

Review 1.  Multisensory perception: beyond modularity and convergence.

Authors:  J Driver; C Spence
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-10-19       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Simultaneity constancy.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kopinska; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Simultaneity constancy: detecting events with touch and vision.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation.

Authors:  Chess Stetson; Xu Cui; P Read Montague; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  The influence of target angular velocity on visual latency difference determined using the rotating Pulfrich effect.

Authors:  R W Nickalls
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Sensory integration within temporally neutral systems states: a hypothesis.

Authors:  E Pöppel; K Schill; N von Steinbüchel
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1990-02

7.  Visual delay as a function of luminance.

Authors:  J A Wilson; S M Anstis
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1969-09

8.  Exposure to asynchronous audiovisual speech extends the temporal window for audiovisual integration.

Authors:  Jordi Navarra; Argiro Vatakis; Massimiliano Zampini; Salvador Soto-Faraco; William Humphreys; Charles Spence
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-31

9.  Unifying multisensory signals across time and space.

Authors:  M T Wallace; G E Roberson; W D Hairston; B E Stein; J W Vaughan; J A Schirillo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Temporal recalibration during asynchronous audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Argiro Vatakis; Jordi Navarra; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.064

View more
  61 in total

1.  Fluctuations of prestimulus oscillatory power predict subjective perception of tactile simultaneity.

Authors:  Joachim Lange; Johanna Halacz; Hanneke van Dijk; Nina Kahlbrock; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Kazuhiro Homma; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adaptation to audiovisual asynchrony modulates the speeded detection of sound.

Authors:  Jordi Navarra; Jessica Hartcher-O'Brien; Elise Piazza; Charles Spence
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Perceived timing of vestibular stimulation relative to touch, light and sound.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multisensory simultaneity recalibration: storage of the aftereffect in the absence of counterevidence.

Authors:  Tonja-Katrin Machulla; Massimiliano Di Luca; Eva Froehlich; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

7.  Temporal binding of auditory and rotational stimuli.

Authors:  Mark C Sanders; Nai-Yuan N Chang; Meghan M Hiss; Rosalie M Uchanski; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Stimulus duration influences perceived simultaneity in audiovisual temporal-order judgment.

Authors:  Lars T Boenke; Matthias Deliano; Frank W Ohl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Multisensory integration is independent of perceived simultaneity.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Asynchrony adaptation reveals neural population code for audio-visual timing.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; James Heron; David Whitaker; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.