Literature DB >> 15560507

Simultaneity constancy.

Agnieszka Kopinska1, Laurence R Harris.   

Abstract

Sound and light take different amounts of time to reach their respective receptors, to be transduced, and to be transmitted to the cortex. Their processing times also vary with factors such as intensity and retinal eccentricity. We assessed the capability of subjects to perceive simultaneity correctly despite these variations. Temporal asynchronies of up to 200 ms were introduced between the components of sound/light pairs. Using the method of constant stimuli, seven subjects judged which came first. Distance, and hence the times of arrival of paired visual and auditory targets, was varied from 1 to 32 m. Visual intensity was varied by viewing the target through 1.8 dB attenuating glasses, and a retinal eccentricity of 20 degrees was compared to central presentation. Despite large differences in reaction times, which varied in a predictable way with the stimulus parameters, the timing of sound/light pairings judged as simultaneous corresponded to when the light and sound left the source simultaneously. Almost complete compensation was found in all conditions tested, showing that these substantial but predictable variations in timing can be taken into account in creating simultaneity constancy.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15560507     DOI: 10.1068/p5169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  34 in total

1.  Fluctuations of prestimulus oscillatory power predict subjective perception of tactile simultaneity.

Authors:  Joachim Lange; Johanna Halacz; Hanneke van Dijk; Nina Kahlbrock; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Synchronizing to real events: subjective audiovisual alignment scales with perceived auditory depth and speed of sound.

Authors:  David Alais; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Perceived timing of first- and second-order changes in vision and hearing.

Authors:  Roberto Arrighi; David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Simultaneity constancy: detecting events with touch and vision.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities.

Authors:  James V M Hanson; James Heron; David Whitaker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effect of exposure to asynchronous audio, visual, and tactile stimulus combinations on the perception of simultaneity.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Simultaneity learning in vision, audition, tactile sense and their cross-modal combinations.

Authors:  Veijo Virsu; Henna Oksanen-Hennah; Anita Vedenpää; Pentti Jaatinen; Pekka Lahti-Nuuttila
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Minding time in an amodal representational space.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Perceived timing of vestibular stimulation relative to touch, light and sound.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Stimulus duration influences perceived simultaneity in audiovisual temporal-order judgment.

Authors:  Lars T Boenke; Matthias Deliano; Frank W Ohl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.