Literature DB >> 16028031

Simultaneity constancy: detecting events with touch and vision.

Vanessa Harrar1, Laurence R Harris.   

Abstract

What are the consequences of visual and tactile neural processing time differences when combining multisensory information about an event on the body's surface? Visual information about such events reaches the brain at a time that is independent of the location of the event. However, tactile information about such events takes different amounts of time to be processed depending on the distance between the stimulated surface and the brain. To investigate the consequences of these differences, we measured reaction times to touches and lights on different parts of the body and the perceived subjective simultaneity (PSS) for various combinations. The PSSs for pairs of stimuli were predicted by the differences in reaction times. When lights and touches were on different body parts (i.e. the hand and foot) a trend towards compensation for any processing time differences was found, such that simultaneity was veridically perceived. When stimuli were both on the foot, subjects perceived simultaneity when the light came on significantly earlier than the touch, despite similar processing times for these stimuli. When the stimuli were both on the hand, however, there was complete compensation for the significant processing time differences between the light and touch such that simultaneity was correctly perceived, a form of simultaneity constancy. To identify if there was a single simultaneity constancy mechanism or multiple parallel mechanisms, we altered the PSS of an auditory-visual stimulus pair and looked for effects on the PSS of a visual-touch pair. After repeated exposure to a light/sound pair with a fixed time lag between them, there was no effect on the PSS of a touch-light pair, suggesting multiple parallel simultaneity constancy mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16028031     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2386-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

Review 1.  Multisensory integration: maintaining the perception of synchrony.

Authors:  Charles Spence; Sarah Squire
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  Cognitive neuroscience: vision and touch are constant companions.

Authors:  Sally Pears; Stephen R Jackson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Neural synergy between kinetic vision and touch.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Kenith V Sobel; Thomas W James
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-06

Review 4.  The neural representation of time.

Authors:  Richard B Ivry; Rebecca M C Spencer
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Simultaneity constancy.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kopinska; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Perceived timing of first- and second-order changes in vision and hearing.

Authors:  Roberto Arrighi; David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cortical synchronization and perceptual framing.

Authors:  S Grossberg; A Grunewald
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Conduction velocities of muscle and cutaneous afferents in the upper and lower limbs of human subjects.

Authors:  G Macefield; S C Gandevia; D Burke
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Visual-auditory distance constancy.

Authors:  G R Engel; W G Dougherty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-12-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Disruptive effects of auditory signal delay on speech perception with lipreading.

Authors:  P C Pandey; H Kunov; S M Abel
Journal:  J Aud Res       Date:  1986-01
View more
  30 in total

1.  Fluctuations of prestimulus oscillatory power predict subjective perception of tactile simultaneity.

Authors:  Joachim Lange; Johanna Halacz; Hanneke van Dijk; Nina Kahlbrock; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Somatotopic dominance in tactile temporal processing.

Authors:  Shinobu Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Naoki Kawakami; Susumu Tachi; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Kazuhiro Homma; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spatial remapping of touch: confusion of perceived stimulus order across hand and foot.

Authors:  Tobias Schicke; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Daniel Sanabria; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The modulation of crossmodal integration by unimodal perceptual grouping: a visuotactile apparent motion study.

Authors:  Georgina Lyons; Daniel Sanabria; Argiro Vatakis; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities.

Authors:  James V M Hanson; James Heron; David Whitaker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The effect of exposure to asynchronous audio, visual, and tactile stimulus combinations on the perception of simultaneity.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Simultaneity learning in vision, audition, tactile sense and their cross-modal combinations.

Authors:  Veijo Virsu; Henna Oksanen-Hennah; Anita Vedenpää; Pentti Jaatinen; Pekka Lahti-Nuuttila
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Perceived timing of vestibular stimulation relative to touch, light and sound.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.