Literature DB >> 19590862

Stimulus duration influences perceived simultaneity in audiovisual temporal-order judgment.

Lars T Boenke1, Matthias Deliano, Frank W Ohl.   

Abstract

The temporal integration of stimuli in different sensory modalities plays a crucial role in multisensory processing. Previous studies using temporal-order judgments to determine the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) with multisensory stimulation yielded conflicting results on modality-specific delays. While it is known that the relative stimulus intensities of stimuli from different sensory modalities affect their perceived temporal order, we have hypothesized that some of these discrepancies might be explained by a previously overlooked confounding factor, namely the duration of the stimulus. We therefore studied the influence of both factors on the PSS in a spatial-audiovisual temporal-order task. In addition to confirming previous results on the role of stimulus intensity, we report that varying the temporal duration of an audiovisual stimulus pair also affects the perceived temporal order of the auditory and visual stimulus components. Although individual PSS values varied from negative to positive values across participants, we found a systematic shift of PSS values in all participants toward a common attractor value with increasing stimulus duration. This resulted in a stabilization of PSS values with increasing stimulus duration, indicative of a mechanism that compensates individual imbalances between sensory modalities, which might arise from attentional biases toward one modality at short stimulus durations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19590862     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1917-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  52 in total

Review 1.  Time perception: brain time or event time?

Authors:  A Johnston; S Nishida
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-06-05       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  The role of spatial disparity and hemifields in audio-visual temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Bayesian inference for psychometric functions.

Authors:  Malte Kuss; Frank Jäkel; Felix A Wichmann
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-05-27       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  A physiological model for the stimulus dependence of first-spike latency of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  Heinrich Neubauer; Peter Heil
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  On the influence of interaural differences on temporal perception of noise bursts of different durations.

Authors:  Othmar Schimmel; Armin Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities.

Authors:  James V M Hanson; James Heron; David Whitaker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: distributions of the first-spike latencies of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Mel Brown; Dexter R F Irvine
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  [Reaction time and temporal serial judgment: corroboration or dissociation?].

Authors:  O Neumann; R Koch; M Niepel; T Tappe
Journal:  Z Exp Angew Psychol       Date:  1992

9.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

10.  Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  33 in total

1.  Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Kazuhiro Homma; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Impaired timing of audiovisual events in the elderly.

Authors:  Gillian Bedard; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Temporal binding of auditory and rotational stimuli.

Authors:  Mark C Sanders; Nai-Yuan N Chang; Meghan M Hiss; Rosalie M Uchanski; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of stimulus duration on audio-visual synchrony perception.

Authors:  I A Kuling; R L J van Eijk; J F Juola; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Stimulus intensity modulates multisensory temporal processing.

Authors:  Juliane Krueger Fister; Ryan A Stevenson; Aaron R Nidiffer; Zachary P Barnett; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Temporal integration of auditory and vestibular stimuli.

Authors:  Nai-Yuan N Chang; Rosalie M Uchanski; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Neurophysiology underlying influence of stimulus reliability on audiovisual integration.

Authors:  Hannah Shatzer; Stanley Shen; Jess R Kerlin; Mark A Pitt; Antoine J Shahin
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Stimulus duration has little effect on auditory, visual and audiovisual temporal order judgement.

Authors:  Kaisa Tiippana; Viljami R Salmela
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Multisensory temporal integration: task and stimulus dependencies.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Persistent perceptual delay for head movement onset relative to auditory stimuli of different durations and rise times.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Sophie M Raeder; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.