Literature DB >> 19458252

Adaptation to audiovisual asynchrony modulates the speeded detection of sound.

Jordi Navarra1, Jessica Hartcher-O'Brien, Elise Piazza, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

The brain adapts to asynchronous audiovisual signals by reducing the subjective temporal lag between them. However, it is currently unclear which sensory signal (visual or auditory) shifts toward the other. According to the idea that the auditory system codes temporal information more precisely than the visual system, one should expect to find some temporal shift of vision toward audition (as in the temporal ventriloquism effect) as a result of adaptation to asynchronous audiovisual signals. Given that visual information gives a more exact estimate of the time of occurrence of distal events than auditory information (due to the fact that the time of arrival of visual information regarding an external event is always closer to the time at which this event occurred), the opposite result could also be expected. Here, we demonstrate that participants' speeded reaction times (RTs) to auditory (but, critically, not visual) stimuli are altered following adaptation to asynchronous audiovisual stimuli. After receiving "baseline" exposure to synchrony, participants were exposed either to auditory-lagging asynchrony (VA group) or to auditory-leading asynchrony (AV group). The results revealed that RTs to sounds became progressively faster (in the VA group) or slower (in the AV group) as participants' exposure to asynchrony increased, thus providing empirical evidence that speeded responses to sounds are influenced by exposure to audiovisual asynchrony.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19458252      PMCID: PMC2695059          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810486106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

1.  Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove; Ken W Grant; David Poeppel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation.

Authors:  Chess Stetson; Xu Cui; P Read Montague; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Neural correlates of multisensory integration of ecologically valid audiovisual events.

Authors:  Jeroen J Stekelenburg; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities.

Authors:  James V M Hanson; James Heron; David Whitaker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of exposure to asynchronous audio, visual, and tactile stimulus combinations on the perception of simultaneity.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Sounds change four-dot masking.

Authors:  Jean Vroomen; Mirjam Keetels
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-11-13

7.  Intermodal timing relations and audio-visual speech recognition by normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  M McGrath; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Adaptation minimizes distance-related audiovisual delays.

Authors:  James Heron; David Whitaker; Paul V McGraw; Kirill V Horoshenkov
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Temporal order judgment and simple reaction times: evidence for a common processing system.

Authors:  Pedro Cardoso-Leite; Andrei Gorea; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Agency, subjective time, and other minds.

Authors:  Kai Engbert; Andreas Wohlschläger; Richard Thomas; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  34 in total

1.  Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Kazuhiro Homma; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Rapid recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; David Alais; John Cass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Multisensory simultaneity recalibration: storage of the aftereffect in the absence of counterevidence.

Authors:  Tonja-Katrin Machulla; Massimiliano Di Luca; Eva Froehlich; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Crossmodal processing.

Authors:  Charles Spence; Daniel Senkowski; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multisensory integration is independent of perceived simultaneity.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spatial receptive field shift by preceding cross-modal stimulation in the cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jinghong Xu; Tingting Bi; Jing Wu; Fanzhu Meng; Kun Wang; Jiawei Hu; Xiao Han; Jiping Zhang; Xiaoming Zhou; Les Keniston; Liping Yu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Attention regulates the plasticity of multisensory timing.

Authors:  James Heron; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker; James V M Hanson
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Rapid, generalized adaptation to asynchronous audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Patrick T Goodbourn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Asynchrony adaptation reveals neural population code for audio-visual timing.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; James Heron; David Whitaker; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Adaptation to motor-visual and motor-auditory temporal lags transfer across modalities.

Authors:  Yoshimori Sugano; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.