Literature DB >> 15112119

Unifying multisensory signals across time and space.

M T Wallace1, G E Roberson, W D Hairston, B E Stein, J W Vaughan, J A Schirillo.   

Abstract

The brain integrates information from multiple sensory modalities and, through this process, generates a coherent and apparently seamless percept of the external world. Although multisensory integration typically binds information that is derived from the same event, when multisensory cues are somewhat discordant they can result in illusory percepts such as the "ventriloquism effect." These biases in stimulus localization are generally accompanied by the perceptual unification of the two stimuli. In the current study, we sought to further elucidate the relationship between localization biases, perceptual unification and measures of a participant's uncertainty in target localization (i.e., variability). Participants performed an auditory localization task in which they were also asked to report on whether they perceived the auditory and visual stimuli to be perceptually unified. The auditory and visual stimuli were delivered at a variety of spatial (0 degrees, 5 degrees, 10 degrees, 15 degrees ) and temporal (200, 500, 800 ms) disparities. Localization bias and reports of perceptual unity occurred even with substantial spatial (i.e., 15 degrees ) and temporal (i.e., 800 ms) disparities. Trial-by-trial comparison of these measures revealed a striking correlation: regardless of their disparity, whenever the auditory and visual stimuli were perceived as unified, they were localized at or very near the light. In contrast, when the stimuli were perceived as not unified, auditory localization was often biased away from the visual stimulus. Furthermore, localization variability was significantly less when the stimuli were perceived as unified. Intriguingly, on non-unity trials such variability increased with decreasing disparity. Together, these results suggest strong and potentially mechanistic links between the multiple facets of multisensory integration that contribute to our perceptual Gestalt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15112119     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1899-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  Spatio-temporal constraints for auditory--visual integration.

Authors:  J Lewald; W H Ehrenstein; R Guski
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Temporal and spatial dependency of the ventriloquism effect.

Authors:  D A Slutsky; G H Recanzone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Multisensory integration in the superior colliculus of the alert cat.

Authors:  M T Wallace; M A Meredith; B E Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Representation and integration of multiple sensory inputs in primate superior colliculus.

Authors:  M T Wallace; L K Wilkinson; B E Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Auditory-visual interaction and the timing of inputs. Thomas (1941) revisited.

Authors:  M Radeau; P Bertelson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1987

6.  The role of visual-auditory "compellingness" in the ventriloquism effect: implications for transitivity among the spatial senses.

Authors:  D H Warren; R B Welch; T J McCarthy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-12

7.  Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance.

Authors:  P Bertelson; M Radeau
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-06

8.  Cross-modal perceptual integration of spatially and temporally disparate auditory and visual stimuli.

Authors:  Jörg Lewald; Rainer Guski
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-05

9.  Visual localization ability influences cross-modal bias.

Authors:  W D Hairston; M T Wallace; J W Vaughan; B E Stein; J L Norris; J A Schirillo
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Effects of degree of visual association and angle of displacement on the "ventriloquism" effect.

Authors:  C E Jack; W R Thurlow
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1973-12
View more
  103 in total

1.  Optimal visual-vestibular integration under conditions of conflicting intersensory motion profiles.

Authors:  John S Butler; Jennifer L Campos; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of walked distances.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Human spatial orientation in non-stationary environments: relation between self-turning perception and detection of surround motion.

Authors:  Reinhart Jürgens; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Collision judgment of objects approaching the head.

Authors:  E Poljac; B Neggers; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cognitive control can modulate intersensory facilitation: speeding up visual antisaccades with an auditory distractor.

Authors:  Holle Kirchner; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effect of exposure to asynchronous audio, visual, and tactile stimulus combinations on the perception of simultaneity.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Simultaneity learning in vision, audition, tactile sense and their cross-modal combinations.

Authors:  Veijo Virsu; Henna Oksanen-Hennah; Anita Vedenpää; Pentti Jaatinen; Pekka Lahti-Nuuttila
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Crossmodal interaction in saccadic reaction time: separating multisensory from warning effects in the time window of integration model.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dynamic reweighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Amanda H Turner; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Multisensory oddity detection as bayesian inference.

Authors:  Timothy Hospedales; Sethu Vijayakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.