Literature DB >> 18165793

Reimplantation of hybrid cochlear implant users with a full-length electrode after loss of residual hearing.

Matthew B Fitzgerald1, Elad Sagi, Michael Jackson, William H Shapiro, J Thomas Roland, Susan B Waltzman, Mario A Svirsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess word recognition and pitch-scaling abilities of cochlear implant users first implanted with a Nucleus 10-mm Hybrid electrode array and then reimplanted with a full length Nucleus Freedom array after loss of residual hearing.
BACKGROUND: Although electroacoustic stimulation is a promising treatment for patients with residual low-frequency hearing,a small subset of them lose that residual hearing. It is not clear whether these patients would be better served by leaving in the 10-mm array and providing electric stimulation through it, or by replacing it with a standard full-length array.
METHODS: Word recognition and pitch-scaling abilities were measured in 2 users of hybrid cochlear implants who lost their residual hearing in the implanted ear after a few months. Tests were repeated over several months, first with a 10-mm array, and after, these patients were reimplanted with a full array. The word recognition task consisted of 2 50-word consonant nucleus consonant (CNC) lists. In the pitch-scaling task, 6 electrodes were stimulated in pseudorandom order, and patients assigned a pitch value to the sensation elicited by each electrode.
RESULTS: Shortly after reimplantation with the full electrode array, speech understanding was much better than with the 10-mm array. Patients improved their ability to perform the pitch-scaling task over time with the full array, although their performance on that task was variable, and the improvements were often small.
CONCLUSION: 1) Short electrode arrays may help preserve residual hearing but may also provide less benefit than traditional cochlear implants for some patients. 2) Pitch percepts in response to electric stimulation may be modified by experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18165793     DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31815c4875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  25 in total

Review 1.  Combined acoustic and electric hearing: preserving residual acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Lina A J Reiss; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  [Hearing with combined electric acoustic stimulation].

Authors:  U Baumann; S Helbig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing.

Authors:  Chin-Tuan Tan; Brett Martin; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Cochlear implantation using the underwater technique: long-term results.

Authors:  Konrad Johannes Stuermer; David Schwarz; Andreas Anagiotos; Ruth Lang-Roth; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink; Jan Christoffer Luers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Residual hearing preservation after pediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ryan F Brown; Timothy E Hullar; Jamie H Cadieux; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Measurement of Cochlear Implant Electrode Position From Intraoperative Post-insertion Skull Radiographs: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Maja Svrakic; David R Friedmann; Phillip M Berman; Adam J Davis; J Thomas Roland; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Maja Svrakic; J Thomas Roland; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Two ears and two (or more?) devices: a pediatric case study of bilateral profound hearing loss.

Authors:  Rosalie M Uchanski; Lisa S Davidson; Sharon Quadrizius; Ruth Reeder; Jamie Cadieux; Jerrica Kettel; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

9.  Reimplantation with a conventional length electrode following residual hearing loss in four hybrid implant recipients.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; David J Archibald; Rene H Gifford; Colin Lw Driscoll; Charles W Beatty
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2011-06-29

Review 10.  Combined electro-acoustic stimulation: a beneficial union?

Authors:  K N Talbot; D E H Hartley
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.597

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.