Literature DB >> 34267572

An Evaluation of the Agreement Between a Computerized Stereoscopic Game Test and the TNO Stereoacuity Test.

Juan Antonio Portela-Camino1, Santiago Martín-González2, Javier Ruiz-Alcocer3, Igor Illarramendi-Mendicute4, Rafaela Garrido-Mercado3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stereo-anomaly is commonly associated with amblyopia. An investigation was conducted to determine whether the measurements of stereoacuity obtained with the stereoacuity reference test (TNO Test) show an agreement with a computer stereoscope video game.
METHODS: Thirty-two subjects (mean age 9.37±2.00 years) with an amblyopia history were selected for a blind and randomized study of stereoacuity improvement through a new random dot game. A masked examiner measured the stereoacuity three times per subject using the TNO test (at the beginning, at the end and after 6 months of the treatment). A second masked examiner measured stereoacuity using the new computerized game after the TNO masked evaluation.
RESULTS: The Pearson's correlation coefficient one test against the other was r2 = 0.767 and the Bland-Altman plot was r2= 0.069 (mean difference -0.03 log sec). Using three categories: poor (840-300 seconds of arc), coarse (480-210 seconds of arc) and moderate-fine stereoacuity (210-30 seconds of arc). Positive predictive values were 89.5% for moderate-fine; 72.7% for coarse; and 90.0% for poor stereoacuity. In addition, the agreement was evaluated using the Kappa coefficient (K= 0.743) with a 0.95 confidence interval and lower and upper Kappa limits were (0.628 and 0.858), respectively. Kappa coefficient and limits were still good when analyzing data before (K =0.663, 0.420 and 0.906) and after the treatment (K= 0.765, 0.632 and 0.899).
CONCLUSION: The Computerized Stereoscopic Game test allows the measure of stereoacuity. It can be used for both the purpose of detecting stereo vision deficits or tracking stereo vision development.
© 2021 Portela-Camino et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TNO test; amblyopia; computerized game test; gamification; stereoacuity

Year:  2021        PMID: 34267572      PMCID: PMC8275165          DOI: 10.2147/OPTO.S308445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)        ISSN: 1179-2752


  38 in total

1.  Learning to see random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  A J O'Toole; D J Kersten
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Stereopsis and contrast.

Authors:  G E Legge; Y C Gu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Stereo vision and strabismus.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Clinical evaluation of stereopsis.

Authors:  Gerald Westheimer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games.

Authors:  Santiago Martín-González; Juan Portela-Camino; Javier Ruiz-Alcocer; Igor Illarramendi-Mendicute; Rafaela Garrido-Mercado
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Recovering stereo vision by squashing virtual bugs in a virtual reality environment.

Authors:  Indu Vedamurthy; David C Knill; Samuel J Huang; Amanda Yung; Jian Ding; Oh-Sang Kwon; Daphne Bavelier; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity.

Authors:  Wendy E Adams; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  ASTEROID: A New Clinical Stereotest on an Autostereo 3D Tablet.

Authors:  Kathleen Vancleef; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; Craig Sharp; Gareth Slack; Carla Black; Therese Casanova; Jess Hugill; Sheima Rafiq; James Burridge; Vito Puyat; Josee Ewane Enongue; Henry Gale; Hannah Akotei; Zoe Collier; Helen Haggerty; Kathryn Smart; Christine Powell; Kate Taylor; Michael P Clarke; Graham Morgan; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis.

Authors:  Kathleen Vancleef; Jenny C A Read; William Herbert; Nicola Goodship; Maeve Woodhouse; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Visual acuity, crowding, and stereo-vision are linked in children with and without amblyopia.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Vijay K Tailor; John J Sloper; Anita J Simmers; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.