Literature DB >> 18039870

Variable strength of translational selection among 12 Drosophila species.

Andreas Heger1, Chris P Ponting.   

Abstract

Codon usage bias in Drosophila melanogaster genes has been attributed to negative selection of those codons whose cellular tRNA abundance restricts rates of mRNA translation. Previous studies, which involved limited numbers of genes, can now be compared against analyses of the entire gene complements of 12 Drosophila species whose genome sequences have become available. Using large numbers (6138) of orthologs represented in all 12 species, we establish that the codon preferences of more closely related species are better correlated. Differences between codon usage biases are attributed, in part, to changes in mutational biases. These biases are apparent from the strong correlation (r = 0.92, P < 0.001) among these genomes' intronic G + C contents and exonic G + C contents at degenerate third codon positions. To perform a cross-species comparison of selection on codon usage, while accounting for changes in mutational biases, we calibrated each genome in turn using the codon usage bias indices of highly expressed ribosomal protein genes. The strength of translational selection was predicted to have varied between species largely according to their phylogeny, with the D. melanogaster group species exhibiting the strongest degree of selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18039870      PMCID: PMC2147958          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.070466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  54 in total

1.  Adjusting for selection on synonymous sites in estimates of evolutionary distance.

Authors:  Aaron E Hirsh; Hunter B Fraser; Dennis P Wall
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  The relationship among gene expression, folding free energy and codon usage bias in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Mengwen Jia; Yanda Li
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 4.124

3.  Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis.

Authors:  L Duret; D Mouchiroud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The evolution of codon preferences in Drosophila: a maximum-likelihood approach to parameter estimation and hypothesis testing.

Authors:  G A McVean; J Vieira
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution.

Authors:  Stephen Richards; Yue Liu; Brian R Bettencourt; Pavel Hradecky; Stan Letovsky; Rasmus Nielsen; Kevin Thornton; Melissa J Hubisz; Rui Chen; Richard P Meisel; Olivier Couronne; Sujun Hua; Mark A Smith; Peili Zhang; Jing Liu; Harmen J Bussemaker; Marinus F van Batenburg; Sally L Howells; Steven E Scherer; Erica Sodergren; Beverly B Matthews; Madeline A Crosby; Andrew J Schroeder; Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos; Catharine M Rives; Michael L Metzker; Donna M Muzny; Graham Scott; David Steffen; David A Wheeler; Kim C Worley; Paul Havlak; K James Durbin; Amy Egan; Rachel Gill; Jennifer Hume; Margaret B Morgan; George Miner; Cerissa Hamilton; Yanmei Huang; Lenée Waldron; Daniel Verduzco; Kerstin P Clerc-Blankenburg; Inna Dubchak; Mohamed A F Noor; Wyatt Anderson; Kevin P White; Andrew G Clark; Stephen W Schaeffer; William Gelbart; George M Weinstock; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Genomic heterogeneity of background substitutional patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Peter F Arndt; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Ensembl 2006.

Authors:  E Birney; D Andrews; M Caccamo; Y Chen; L Clarke; G Coates; T Cox; F Cunningham; V Curwen; T Cutts; T Down; R Durbin; X M Fernandez-Suarez; P Flicek; S Gräf; M Hammond; J Herrero; K Howe; V Iyer; K Jekosch; A Kähäri; A Kasprzyk; D Keefe; F Kokocinski; E Kulesha; D London; I Longden; C Melsopp; P Meidl; B Overduin; A Parker; G Proctor; A Prlic; M Rae; D Rios; S Redmond; M Schuster; I Sealy; S Searle; J Severin; G Slater; D Smedley; J Smith; A Stabenau; J Stalker; S Trevanion; A Ureta-Vidal; J Vogel; S White; C Woodwark; T J P Hubbard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  FlyBase: anatomical data, images and queries.

Authors:  Gary Grumbling; Victor Strelets
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison.

Authors:  Guy St C Slater; Ewan Birney
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  22 in total

1.  Imogene: identification of motifs and cis-regulatory modules underlying gene co-regulation.

Authors:  Hervé Rouault; Marc Santolini; François Schweisguth; Vincent Hakim
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Coadaptation of isoacceptor tRNA genes and codon usage bias for translation efficiency in Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  S K Behura; D W Severson
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.585

3.  Selection on codon usage and base composition in Drosophila americana.

Authors:  Sophie Marion de Procé; Kai Zeng; Andrea J Betancourt; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Recent and Long-Term Selection Across Synonymous Sites in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Recombination yet inefficient selection along the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup's fourth chromosome.

Authors:  J Roman Arguello; Yue Zhang; Tomoyuki Kado; Chuanzhu Fan; Ruoping Zhao; Hideki Innan; Wen Wang; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Evolutionary rate analyses of orthologs and paralogs from 12 Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Andreas Heger; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Evidence for a transport-trap mode of Drosophila melanogaster gurken mRNA localization.

Authors:  Lan Lan; Shengyin Lin; Sui Zhang; Robert S Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Peter F Arndt; Andrew G Clark; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Accelerated sequence divergence of conserved genomic elements in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alisha K Holloway; David J Begun; Adam Siepel; Katherine S Pollard
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Effect of exonic splicing regulation on synonymous codon usage in alternatively spliced exons of Dscam.

Authors:  Aya Takahashi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.