Literature DB >> 15632085

Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution.

Stephen Richards1, Yue Liu, Brian R Bettencourt, Pavel Hradecky, Stan Letovsky, Rasmus Nielsen, Kevin Thornton, Melissa J Hubisz, Rui Chen, Richard P Meisel, Olivier Couronne, Sujun Hua, Mark A Smith, Peili Zhang, Jing Liu, Harmen J Bussemaker, Marinus F van Batenburg, Sally L Howells, Steven E Scherer, Erica Sodergren, Beverly B Matthews, Madeline A Crosby, Andrew J Schroeder, Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos, Catharine M Rives, Michael L Metzker, Donna M Muzny, Graham Scott, David Steffen, David A Wheeler, Kim C Worley, Paul Havlak, K James Durbin, Amy Egan, Rachel Gill, Jennifer Hume, Margaret B Morgan, George Miner, Cerissa Hamilton, Yanmei Huang, Lenée Waldron, Daniel Verduzco, Kerstin P Clerc-Blankenburg, Inna Dubchak, Mohamed A F Noor, Wyatt Anderson, Kevin P White, Andrew G Clark, Stephen W Schaeffer, William Gelbart, George M Weinstock, Richard A Gibbs.   

Abstract

We have sequenced the genome of a second Drosophila species, Drosophila pseudoobscura, and compared this to the genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster, a primary model organism. Throughout evolution the vast majority of Drosophila genes have remained on the same chromosome arm, but within each arm gene order has been extensively reshuffled, leading to a minimum of 921 syntenic blocks shared between the species. A repetitive sequence is found in the D. pseudoobscura genome at many junctions between adjacent syntenic blocks. Analysis of this novel repetitive element family suggests that recombination between offset elements may have given rise to many paracentric inversions, thereby contributing to the shuffling of gene order in the D. pseudoobscura lineage. Based on sequence similarity and synteny, 10,516 putative orthologs have been identified as a core gene set conserved over 25-55 million years (Myr) since the pseudoobscura/melanogaster divergence. Genes expressed in the testes had higher amino acid sequence divergence than the genome-wide average, consistent with the rapid evolution of sex-specific proteins. Cis-regulatory sequences are more conserved than random and nearby sequences between the species--but the difference is slight, suggesting that the evolution of cis-regulatory elements is flexible. Overall, a pattern of repeat-mediated chromosomal rearrangement, and high coadaptation of both male genes and cis-regulatory sequences emerges as important themes of genome divergence between these species of Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15632085      PMCID: PMC540289          DOI: 10.1101/gr.3059305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  82 in total

1.  Generation of a widespread Drosophila inversion by a transposable element.

Authors:  M Cáceres; J M Ranz; A Barbadilla; M Long; A Ruiz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Rates of conservative and radical nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions in mammalian nuclear genes.

Authors:  J Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element.

Authors:  M Z Ludwig; C Bergman; N H Patel; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Mobile elements and the genesis of microsatellites in dipterans.

Authors:  J Wilder; H Hollocher
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Integrating genomic homology into gene structure prediction.

Authors:  I Korf; P Flicek; D Duan; M R Brent
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Using GeneWise in the Drosophila annotation experiment.

Authors:  E Birney; R Durbin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The fourth chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster: interspersed euchromatic and heterochromatic domains.

Authors:  F L Sun; M H Cuaycong; C A Craig; L L Wallrath; J Locke; S C Elgin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Mobile elements and chromosomal evolution in the virilis group of Drosophila.

Authors:  M B Evgen'ev; H Zelentsova; H Poluectova; G T Lyozin; V Veleikodvorskaja; K I Pyatkov; L A Zhivotovsky; M G Kidwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Are chromosomal inversions induced by transposable elements? A paradigm from the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  K D Mathiopoulos; A della Torre; F Santolamazza; V Predazzi; V Petrarca; M Coluzzi
Journal:  Parassitologia       Date:  1999-09
View more
  279 in total

Review 1.  A decade of 3C technologies: insights into nuclear organization.

Authors:  Elzo de Wit; Wouter de Laat
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence.

Authors:  Patricia J Wittkopp; Gizem Kalay
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  LOESS correction for length variation in gene set-based genomic sequence analysis.

Authors:  Anton Aboukhalil; Martha L Bulyk
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Geographic selection in the small heat shock gene complex differentiating populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Allie M Graham; Jennifer D Merrill; Suzanne E McGaugh; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  Resolving intralocus sexual conflict: genetic mechanisms and time frame.

Authors:  Andrew D Stewart; Alison Pischedda; William R Rice
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

6.  Fragile regions and not functional constraints predominate in shaping gene organization in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  Marcin von Grotthuss; Michael Ashburner; José M Ranz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  A single gene causes both male sterility and segregation distortion in Drosophila hybrids.

Authors:  Nitin Phadnis; H Allen Orr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Demasculinization of X chromosomes in the Drosophila genus.

Authors:  David Sturgill; Yu Zhang; Michael Parisi; Brian Oliver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Constraint and turnover in sex-biased gene expression in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; David Sturgill; Michael Parisi; Sudhir Kumar; Brian Oliver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Phylogenetic incongruence in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.

Authors:  Alex Wong; Jeffrey D Jensen; John E Pool; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 4.286

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.