Literature DB >> 21849309

Selection on codon usage and base composition in Drosophila americana.

Sophie Marion de Procé1, Kai Zeng, Andrea J Betancourt, Brian Charlesworth.   

Abstract

We have used a polymorphism dataset on introns and coding sequences of X-linked loci in Drosophila americana to estimate the strength of selection on codon usage and/or biased gene conversion (BGC), taking into account a recent population expansion detected by a maximum-likelihood method. Drosophila americana was previously thought to have a stable demographic history, so that this evidence for a recent population expansion means that previous estimates of selection need revision. There was evidence for natural selection or BGC favouring GC over AT variants in introns, which is stronger for GC-rich than GC-poor introns. By comparing introns and coding sequences, we found evidence for selection on codon usage bias, which is much stronger than the forces acting on GC versus AT basepairs in introns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21849309      PMCID: PMC3259966          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  22 in total

Review 1.  Biased gene conversion: implications for genome and sex evolution.

Authors:  Gabriel Marais
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  GC-biased segregation of noncoding polymorphisms in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nicolas Galtier; Eric Bazin; Nicolas Bierne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The effect of change in population size on DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Chromosomal and allelic variation in Drosophila americana: selective maintenance of a chromosomal cline.

Authors:  Bryant F McAllister
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.166

5.  Inferring parameters of mutation, selection and demography from patterns of synonymous site evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  G A McVean; J Vieira
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Determinants of synonymous and nonsynonymous variability in three species of Drosophila.

Authors:  Penelope R Haddrill; Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron; Theodore B Guthrie
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Selection on codon usage in Drosophila americana.

Authors:  Xulio Maside; Angela Weishan Lee; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-01-20       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Temporal patterns of fruit fly (Drosophila) evolution revealed by mutation clocks.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Sankar Subramanian; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Recent and Long-Term Selection Across Synonymous Sites in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Optimal codons in Tremella fuciformis end in C/G, a strong difference with known Tremella species.

Authors:  Youjin Deng; Xiaoxing Huang; Banzhan Ruan; Baogui Xie; Arend Frans van Peer; Yuji Jiang
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Evolution of Codon Usage Bias in Diatoms.

Authors:  Marc Krasovec; Dmitry A Filatov
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Evidence that natural selection on codon usage in Drosophila pseudoobscura varies across codons.

Authors:  Richard M Kliman
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.154

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.