Literature DB >> 18583644

Accelerated sequence divergence of conserved genomic elements in Drosophila melanogaster.

Alisha K Holloway1, David J Begun, Adam Siepel, Katherine S Pollard.   

Abstract

Recent genomic sequencing of 10 additional Drosophila genomes provides a rich resource for comparative genomics analyses aimed at understanding the similarities and differences between species and between Drosophila and mammals. Using a phylogenetic approach, we identified 64 genomic elements that have been highly conserved over most of the Drosophila tree, but that have experienced a recent burst of evolution along the Drosophila melanogaster lineage. Compared to similarly defined elements in humans, these regions of rapid lineage-specific evolution in Drosophila differ dramatically in location, mechanism of evolution, and functional properties of associated genes. Notably, the majority reside in protein-coding regions and primarily result from rapid adaptive synonymous site evolution. In fact, adaptive evolution appears to be driving substitutions to unpreferred codons. Our analysis also highlights interesting noncoding genomic regions, such as regulatory regions in the gene gooseberry-neuro and a putative novel miRNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18583644      PMCID: PMC2556263          DOI: 10.1101/gr.077131.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  68 in total

1.  The UCSC Genome Browser Database.

Authors:  D Karolchik; R Baertsch; M Diekhans; T S Furey; A Hinrichs; Y T Lu; K M Roskin; M Schwartz; C W Sugnet; D J Thomas; R J Weber; D Haussler; W J Kent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data.

Authors:  R R Hudson; M Kreitman; M Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The efficiency of folding of some proteins is increased by controlled rates of translation in vivo. A hypothesis.

Authors:  I J Purvis; A J Bettany; T C Santiago; J R Coggins; K Duncan; R Eason; A J Brown
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-01-20       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  An examination of the constancy of the rate of molecular evolution.

Authors:  C H Langley; W M Fitch
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  On the constancy of the evolutionary rate of cistrons.

Authors:  T Ota; M Kimura
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information.

Authors:  M Zuker; P Stiegler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nick G C Smith; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Evidence for use of rare codons in the dnaG gene and other regulatory genes of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  W Konigsberg; G N Godson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Structure of two genes at the gooseberry locus related to the paired gene and their spatial expression during Drosophila embryogenesis.

Authors:  S Baumgartner; D Bopp; M Burri; M Noll
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  16 in total

1.  Accelerated evolution of constraint elements for hematophagic adaptation in mosquitoes.

Authors:  Ming-Shan Wang; Adeniyi C Adeola; Yan Li; Ya-Ping Zhang; Dong-Dong Wu
Journal:  Dongwuxue Yanjiu       Date:  2015-11-18

2.  PHAST and RPHAST: phylogenetic analysis with space/time models.

Authors:  Melissa J Hubisz; Katherine S Pollard; Adam Siepel
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Complex interplay of evolutionary forces in the ladybird homeobox genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Evgeniy S Balakirev; Maria Anisimova; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Methods to detect selection on noncoding DNA.

Authors:  Ying Zhen; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

5.  Polygenic and directional regulatory evolution across pathways in Saccharomyces.

Authors:  James H Bullard; Yulia Mostovoy; Sandrine Dudoit; Rachel B Brem
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Locus-specific decoupling of base composition evolution at synonymous sites and introns along the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila sechellia lineages.

Authors:  Vanessa L Bauer DuMont; Nadia D Singh; Mark H Wright; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-05-25       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Positive selection differs between protein secondary structure elements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Kate E Ridout; Christopher J Dixon; Dmitry A Filatov
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Multidimensional adaptive evolution of a feed-forward network and the illusion of compensation.

Authors:  Kevin Bullaughey
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Population genomic analysis of base composition evolution in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Yu-Ping Poh; Chau-Ti Ting; Hua-Wen Fu; Charles H Langley; David J Begun
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  A machine learning approach for identifying novel cell type-specific transcriptional regulators of myogenesis.

Authors:  Brian W Busser; Leila Taher; Yongsok Kim; Terese Tansey; Molly J Bloom; Ivan Ovcharenko; Alan M Michelson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.