PURPOSE: Respiratory motion is a significant source of anatomic uncertainty in radiotherapy planning and can result in errors of portal size and the subsequent radiation dose. Although four-dimensional computed tomography allows for more accurate analysis of the respiratory cycle, breathing irregularities during data acquisition can cause considerable image distortions. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of respiratory irregularities on four-dimensional computed tomography, and to evaluate a novel image reconstruction algorithm using percentile-based tagging of the respiratory cycle. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Respiratory-correlated helical computed tomography scans were acquired for 11 consecutive patients. The inspiration and expiration data sets were reconstructed using the default phase-based method, as well as a novel respiration percentile-based method with patient-specific metrics to define the ranges of the reconstruction. The image output was analyzed in a blinded fashion for the phase- and percentile-based reconstructions to determine the prevalence and severity of the image artifacts. RESULTS: The percentile-based algorithm resulted in a significant reduction in artifact severity compared with the phase-based algorithm, although the overall artifact prevalence did not differ between the two algorithms. The magnitude of differences in respiratory tag placement between the phase- and percentile-based algorithms correlated with the presence of image artifacts. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have indicated that our novel four-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction method could be useful in detecting clinically relevant image distortions that might otherwise go unnoticed and to reduce the image distortion associated with some respiratory irregularities. Additional work is necessary to assess the clinical impact on areas of possible irregular breathing.
PURPOSE: Respiratory motion is a significant source of anatomic uncertainty in radiotherapy planning and can result in errors of portal size and the subsequent radiation dose. Although four-dimensional computed tomography allows for more accurate analysis of the respiratory cycle, breathing irregularities during data acquisition can cause considerable image distortions. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of respiratory irregularities on four-dimensional computed tomography, and to evaluate a novel image reconstruction algorithm using percentile-based tagging of the respiratory cycle. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Respiratory-correlated helical computed tomography scans were acquired for 11 consecutive patients. The inspiration and expiration data sets were reconstructed using the default phase-based method, as well as a novel respiration percentile-based method with patient-specific metrics to define the ranges of the reconstruction. The image output was analyzed in a blinded fashion for the phase- and percentile-based reconstructions to determine the prevalence and severity of the image artifacts. RESULTS: The percentile-based algorithm resulted in a significant reduction in artifact severity compared with the phase-based algorithm, although the overall artifact prevalence did not differ between the two algorithms. The magnitude of differences in respiratory tag placement between the phase- and percentile-based algorithms correlated with the presence of image artifacts. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have indicated that our novel four-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction method could be useful in detecting clinically relevant image distortions that might otherwise go unnoticed and to reduce the image distortion associated with some respiratory irregularities. Additional work is necessary to assess the clinical impact on areas of possible irregular breathing.
Authors: Wei Lu; Michelle M Nystrom; Parag J Parikh; David R Fooshee; James P Hubenschmidt; Jeffrey D Bradley; Daniel A Low Journal: Med Phys Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Daniel A Low; Parag J Parikh; Wei Lu; James F Dempsey; Sasha H Wahab; James P Hubenschmidt; Michelle M Nystrom; Maureen Handoko; Jeffrey D Bradley Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Paul J Keall; Gig S Mageras; James M Balter; Richard S Emery; Kenneth M Forster; Steve B Jiang; Jeffrey M Kapatoes; Daniel A Low; Martin J Murphy; Brad R Murray; Chester R Ramsey; Marcel B Van Herk; S Sastry Vedam; John W Wong; Ellen Yorke Journal: Med Phys Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: John R van Sörnsen de Koste; Frank J Lagerwaard; Margriet R J Nijssen-Visser; Wilfried J Graveland; Suresh Senan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: G S Mageras; E Yorke; K Rosenzweig; L Braban; E Keatley; E Ford; S A Leibel; C C Ling Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2001 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Min Li; Sarah Joy Castillo; Richard Castillo; Edward Castillo; Thomas Guerrero; Liang Xiao; Xiaolin Zheng Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Paul K R Dasari; Mohammed Salman Shazeeb; Arda Könik; Clifford Lindsay; Joyeeta M Mukherjee; Karen L Johnson; Michael A King Journal: Med Phys Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Mathieu Hatt; John A Lee; Charles R Schmidtlein; Issam El Naqa; Curtis Caldwell; Elisabetta De Bernardi; Wei Lu; Shiva Das; Xavier Geets; Vincent Gregoire; Robert Jeraj; Michael P MacManus; Osama R Mawlawi; Ursula Nestle; Andrei B Pugachev; Heiko Schöder; Tony Shepherd; Emiliano Spezi; Dimitris Visvikis; Habib Zaidi; Assen S Kirov Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Paul K R Dasari; Arda Könik; P Hendrik Pretorius; Karen L Johnson; William P Segars; Mohammed S Shazeeb; Michael A King Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Paul Dasari; Karen Johnson; Joyoni Dey; Clifford Lindsay; Mohammed S Shazeeb; Joyeeta Mitra Mukherjee; Shaokuan Zheng; Michael A King Journal: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 1.679
Authors: Guang Li; Jie Wei; Hailiang Huang; Qing Chen; Carl P Gaebler; Tiffany Lin; Amy Yuan; Andreas Rimner; James Mechalakos Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.071