Literature DB >> 16530352

[Detection of nasal colonization methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a prospective study comparing real-time genic amplification assay vs selective chromogenic media].

J-C Nguyen Van1, M-D Kitzis, A Ly, A Chalfine, J Carlet, A Ben Ali, F Goldstein.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In contrast to "classical" genic amplification, real-time genic amplification can be performed in every laboratory without the need of sophisticated isolation procedures. Moreover, real-time genic amplification allows an early detection of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization, 2 hours compared to 1 or 2 days for culture.
OBJECTIVE: In order to assess the feasibility on Smartcycler of the IDI-MRSA real-time genic amplification assay in comparison with chromogenic media.
METHODS: A prospective study has been initiated in July 2004: nasal swabs were taken from patients entering the ICU, vascular surgery, diabetology and geriatry wards. During a 4 months period, 682 specimens have been obtained from 508 patients.
RESULTS: Sixty-four (9.3%) patients were positive by genic amplification and selective agar culture (CHROMagar MRSA, MRSASelect and/or ORSAB), 19 (2.9%) were positive by genic amplification only (3 of these patients were under antibiotic treatment); 572 specimens remained negative by both methods. The sensitivity and specificity of this assay were 100% and 96% respectively with a positive predictive value of 70% and negative predictive value of 100%. Initially 82 nasal specimens were unresolved (12%). 38 were resolved following a freeze-thaw cycle. Thus, 44 (6.4%) were unresolved specimens. Comparison between CHROMagar MRSA and MRSASelect showed a good correlation for the detection at 24 hours (5.5% and 5.6% respectively). These two chromogenic media allowed a much better detection of MRSA than ORSAB medium within 24H.
CONCLUSION: The results obtained by the early real-time genic amplification for the detection of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus are promising. Despite 6.4% amplification failure, we consider that IDI-MRSA real-time genic amplification assay represents a significant breakthrough in the detection of colonization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16530352     DOI: 10.1016/j.patbio.2006.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)        ISSN: 0369-8114


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay on the SmartCycler real-time PCR platform for rapid detection of MRSA from screening specimens.

Authors:  A S Rossney; C M Herra; M M Fitzgibbon; P M Morgan; M J Lawrence; B O'Connell
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Performance of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus test before and during high-volume clinical use.

Authors:  Suzanne M Paule; Donna M Hacek; Bridget Kufner; Karine Truchon; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul; Ari Robicsek; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical application of real-time PCR to screening critically ill and emergency-care surgical patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a quantitative analytical study.

Authors:  M Trent Herdman; Duncan Wyncoll; Eugene Halligan; Penelope R Cliff; Gary French; Jonathan D Edgeworth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Performance of the BD GeneOhm MRSA achromopeptidase assay for real-time PCR detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nasal specimens.

Authors:  Parul A Patel; Nathan A Ledeboer; Christine C Ginocchio; Susan Condon; Stephanie Bouchard; Peibing Qin; Tobi Karchmer; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR assay to culture by use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance cultures from intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  James W Snyder; Gina K Munier; Charles L Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Prevalence of resistance and toxin genes in community-acquired and hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates.

Authors:  Khaled Z El-Baghdady; Mervat I El-Borhamy; Hisham A Abd El-Ghafar
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.699

8.  Hormone therapy alters the composition of the vaginal microflora in ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  E Bezirtzoglou; Ch Voidarou; A Papadaki; A Tsiotsias; O Kotsovolou; M Konstandi
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Screening agars for MRSA: evaluation of a stepwise diagnostic approach with two different selective agars for the screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  Volker Micheel; Benedikt Hogan; Thomas Köller; Philipp Warnke; Sabine Crusius; Rebecca Hinz; Ralf Matthias Hagen; Norbert Georg Schwarz; Hagen Frickmann
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2015-07-21

10.  Ten-year decrease of acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia at a single institution: the result of a multifaceted program combining cross-transmission prevention and antimicrobial stewardship.

Authors:  Annie Chalfine; Marie-Dominique Kitzis; Yvonnick Bezie; Adel Benali; Laurence Perniceni; Jean-Claude Nguyen; Marie Françoise Dumay; Jacqueline Gonot; Gilles Rejasse; Fred Goldstein; Jean Carlet; Benoît Misset
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.887

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.