Literature DB >> 16597841

Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay for detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus from nasal and rectal specimens pooled in a selective broth.

M Desjardins1, Christiane Guibord, B Lalonde, B Toye, K Ramotar.   

Abstract

Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by PCR can be performed directly from nasal specimens with the IDI-MRSA assay. To improve the efficiency of screening, we evaluated the performance of the IDI-MRSA assay for the detection of MRSA from pooled and unpooled specimens cultured in a selective broth. Of the 287 specimens evaluated, 71 were culture and PCR positive, 203 were culture and PCR negative, 3 were culture positive and PCR negative, 8 were culture negative and PCR positive, and 2 remained inhibited. A methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolate was recovered from five of the eight specimens with false-positive PCR results. Compared to the results of culture, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative [corrected] predictive values of the IDI-MRSA assay for detection of MRSA from broth were 96%, 96%, 90%, and 98%, respectively. Following implementation of the IDI-MRSA assay, PCR-positive broths were subcultured for evaluation of assay performance. Of the 298 IDI-MRSA assay-positive broths, the results for 103 could not be confirmed by culture. A methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolate was recovered from 77 of these 103 broths. Repeat testing by the IDI-MRSA assay directly with the MSSA isolates confirmed the original positive PCR result. The positive predictive value of the IDI-MRSA assay fell from 90% during the evaluation phase to 65% postimplementation. The IDI-MRSA assay performed well for the detection of MRSA from a selective broth compared to the performance of the detection of MRSA from culture. However, because of the burden associated with implementation of infection control precautions, cultures remain essential in confirming positive IDI-MRSA results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16597841      PMCID: PMC1448652          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.44.4.1219-1223.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  27 in total

1.  Rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and simultaneous species confirmation using real-time fluorescence PCR.

Authors:  U Reischl; H J Linde; M Metz; B Leppmeier; N Lehn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Laboratory characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian hospitals: results of 5 years of National Surveillance, 1995-1999.

Authors:  Andrew E Simor; Marianna Ofner-Agostini; Elizabeth Bryce; Allison McGeer; Shirley Paton; Michael R Mulvey
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Direct detection of mecA, nuc and 16S rRNA genes in BacT/Alert blood culture bottles.

Authors:  P Lem; J Spiegelman; B Toye; K Ramotar
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Use of broth enrichment and real-time PCR to exclude the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical samples: a sensitive screening approach.

Authors:  P Nilsson; H Alexandersson; T Ripa
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  The economic impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian hospitals.

Authors:  T Kim; P I Oh; A E Simor
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  T Ito; Y Katayama; K Asada; N Mori; K Tsutsumimoto; C Tiensasitorn; K Hiramatsu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Performance of a new chromogenic oxacillin resistance screen medium (Oxoid) in the detection and presumptive identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Petra Apfalter; Ojan Assadian; Andrea Kalczyk; Verena Lindenmann; Athanasios Makristathis; Stefan Mustafa; Manfred Rotter; Alexander M Hirschl
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara E Cosgrove; George Sakoulas; Eli N Perencevich; Mitchell J Schwaber; Adolf W Karchmer; Yehuda Carmeli
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-12-13       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Type 1 capsule genes of Staphylococcus aureus are carried in a staphylococcal cassette chromosome genetic element.

Authors:  Thanh T Luong; Shu Ouyang; Kelly Bush; Chia Y Lee
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from sterile or nonsterile clinical samples by a new molecular assay.

Authors:  Patrice Francois; Didier Pittet; Manuela Bento; Béatrice Pepey; Pierre Vaudaux; Daniel Lew; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  40 in total

Review 1.  Next-generation and whole-genome sequencing in the diagnostic clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  W M Dunne; L F Westblade; B Ford
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Evaluation of the BD GeneOhm assay using the rotor-gene 6000 platform for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from pooled screening swabs.

Authors:  Melvyn Howard Smith; Julian Hodgson; Ian Joseph Eltringham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Verification of the IDI-MRSA assay for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diverse specimen types in a core clinical laboratory setting.

Authors:  Steven J Drews; Barbara M Willey; Nathan Kreiswirth; Min Wang; Teresa Ianes; Jayne Mitchell; Mary Latchford; Allison J McGeer; Kevin C Katz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay on the SmartCycler real-time PCR platform for rapid detection of MRSA from screening specimens.

Authors:  A S Rossney; C M Herra; M M Fitzgibbon; P M Morgan; M J Lawrence; B O'Connell
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection: comparison of two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR assay) with three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA) for use with infection-control swabs.

Authors:  S J van Hal; D Stark; B Lockwood; D Marriott; J Harkness
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of two versions of the IDI-MRSA assay using charcoal swabs for prospective nasal and nonnasal surveillance samples.

Authors:  Sean X Zhang; Steven J Drews; Joanne Tomassi; Kevin C Katz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of three molecular assays for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Patrice Francois; Manuela Bento; Gesuele Renzi; Stephan Harbarth; Didier Pittet; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  MRSA detection: comparison of two molecular methods (BD GeneOhm PCR assay and Easy-Plex) with two selective MRSA agars (MRSA-ID and Oxoid MRSA) for nasal swabs.

Authors:  S J van Hal; Z Jennings; D Stark; D Marriott; J Harkness
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Detection of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec-associated DNA segments in multiresistant methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis ccrAB4 in both methicillin-resistant S. aureus and MSSA.

Authors:  Anna C Shore; Angela S Rossney; Brian O'Connell; Celine M Herra; Derek J Sullivan; Hilary Humphreys; David C Coleman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.