Literature DB >> 15583284

Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay.

David K Warren1, Robert S Liao, Liana R Merz, Michael Eveland, W Michael Dunne.   

Abstract

Screening for colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a key aspect of infection control to limit the nosocomial spread of this organism. Current methods for the detection of MRSA in clinical microbiology laboratories, including molecularly based techniques, require a culture step and the isolation of pure colonies that result in a minimum of 20 to 24 h until a result is known. We describe a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the rapid detection of MRSA directly from nasal swab specimens (IDI-MRSA; Infectio Diagnostic, Inc., Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada), based upon a real-time PCR and direct detection of MRSA via amplicon hybridization with a fluorogenic target-specific molecular beacon probe. Samples from 288 patients were analyzed for the presence of MRSA with the IDI-MRSA assay, compared to detection by either direct plating or enrichment broth selective culture methods. The diagnostic values for this MRSA screening method were 91.7% sensitivity, 93.5% specificity, 82.5% positive predictive value, and 97.1% negative predictive value when compared to culture-based methods. The time from the start of processing of specimen to result was approximately 1.5 h. In our hands, the IDI-MRSA assay is a sensitive and specific test for detection of nasal colonization with MRSA and providing for same-day results, allowing more efficient and effective use of infection control resources to control MRSA in health care facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15583284      PMCID: PMC535250          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5578-5581.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  31 in total

1.  Exfoliative dermatitis as a risk factor for epidemic spread of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J B Love; C A Wright; D H Hooke; W G Parkin; P Bills; R Baird
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  A rapid latex agglutination assay for the detection of penicillin-binding protein 2'.

Authors:  Y Nakatomi; J Sugiyama
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.955

3.  Multicolor molecular beacons for allele discrimination.

Authors:  S Tyagi; D P Bratu; F R Kramer
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Rapid detection of the staphylococcal mecA gene from BACTEC blood culture bottles by the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  K C Carroll; R B Leonard; P L Newcomb-Gayman; D R Hillyard
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a high school wrestling team and the surrounding community.

Authors:  J M Lindenmayer; S Schoenfeld; R O'Grady; J K Carney
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-04-27

6.  Sensitivity of surveillance cultures for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a nursing-home-care unit.

Authors:  D L Sewell; S A Potter; C M Jacobson; L J Strausbaugh; T T Ward
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  Impact of methicillin resistance on the outcome of patients with bacteremia caused by Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S Harbarth; O Rutschmann; P Sudre; D Pittet
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-01-26

Review 8.  Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications.

Authors:  H F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  The economic impact of Staphylococcus aureus infection in New York City hospitals.

Authors:  R J Rubin; C A Harrington; A Poon; K Dietrich; J A Greene; A Moiduddin
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Effectiveness of contact isolation during a hospital outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J A Jernigan; M G Titus; D H Gröschel; S Getchell-White; B M Farr
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Next-generation and whole-genome sequencing in the diagnostic clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  W M Dunne; L F Westblade; B Ford
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Rapid confirmation of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonies on chromogenic agars by a new commercial PCR assay, the GenomEra MRSA/SA Diagnose.

Authors:  J J Hirvonen; M Nevalainen; P Tissari; S Salmenlinna; K Rantakokko-Jalava; S-S Kaukoranta
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: quantifying the effects of interventions and rapid diagnostic testing.

Authors:  M C J Bootsma; O Diekmann; M J M Bonten
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Rapid molecular detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M W D Wren; Caroline Carder; P G Coen; V Gant; A P R Wilson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Concurrent analysis of nose and groin swab specimens by the IDI-MRSA PCR assay is comparable to analysis by individual-specimen PCR and routine culture assays for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Emma J Bishop; Elizabeth A Grabsch; Susan A Ballard; Barrie Mayall; Shirley Xie; Rhea Martin; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Be aware of the possibility of false-positive results in single-locus PCR assays for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jan Rupp; Ines Fenner; Werner Solbach; Jens Gieffers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Verification of the IDI-MRSA assay for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diverse specimen types in a core clinical laboratory setting.

Authors:  Steven J Drews; Barbara M Willey; Nathan Kreiswirth; Min Wang; Teresa Ianes; Jayne Mitchell; Mary Latchford; Allison J McGeer; Kevin C Katz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of an enrichment broth-enhanced commercial PCR procedure versus bacteriological culture for separating non-colonized from suspected or colonized MRSA individuals.

Authors:  J H T Wagenvoort; M F H A van de Cruijs; C T M Meuwissen; J M H Gronenschild; E I G B De Brauwer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  MRSA detection: comparison of two molecular methods (BD GeneOhm PCR assay and Easy-Plex) with two selective MRSA agars (MRSA-ID and Oxoid MRSA) for nasal swabs.

Authors:  S J van Hal; Z Jennings; D Stark; D Marriott; J Harkness
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.