Literature DB >> 16891510

Concurrent analysis of nose and groin swab specimens by the IDI-MRSA PCR assay is comparable to analysis by individual-specimen PCR and routine culture assays for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Emma J Bishop1, Elizabeth A Grabsch, Susan A Ballard, Barrie Mayall, Shirley Xie, Rhea Martin, M Lindsay Grayson.   

Abstract

The IDI-MRSA assay (Infectio Diagnostic, Inc., Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada) with the Smart Cycler II rapid DNA amplification system (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) appears to be sensitive and specific for the rapid detection of nasal colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of this assay under conditions in which both the nose and cutaneous groin specimens were analyzed together and compared the accuracy of this PCR approach to that when these specimens were tested separately and by culture assays in an inpatient population with known high rates (12 to 15%) of MRSA colonization. Of 211 patients screened, 192 had results assessable by all three methods (agar-broth culture, separate nose and groin IDI-MRSA assay, and combined nose-groin IDI-MRSA assay), with MRSA carriage noted in 31/192 (16.1%), 41/192 (21.4%), and 36/192 (18.8%) patients by each method, respectively. Compared to agar culture results, the sensitivity and specificity of the combined nose-groin IDI-MRSA assay were 88.0% and 91.6%, respectively, whereas when each specimen was processed separately, the sensitivities were 90.0% (nose) and 83.3% (groin) and the specificities were 91.7% (nose) and 90.2% (groin). IDI-MRSA assay of a combined nose-groin specimen appears to have an accuracy similar to that of the current recommended PCR protocol, providing results in a clinically useful time frame, and may represent a more cost-effective approach to using this assay for screening for MRSA colonization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16891510      PMCID: PMC1594615          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02211-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  20 in total

1.  Three-year study of targeted screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission.

Authors:  T L Que; P L Ho; K T Yip; H L Ng; F Y Leung; K K Lai; K Y Yuen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2003, issued August 2003.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Efficacy of an alcohol/chlorhexidine hand hygiene program in a hospital with high rates of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection.

Authors:  Paul D R Johnson; Rhea Martin; Laurelle J Burrell; Elizabeth A Grabsch; Susan W Kirsa; Jason O'Keeffe; Barrie C Mayall; Deidre Edmonds; Wendy Barr; Christopher Bolger; Humsha Naidoo; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Sensitivity of surveillance cultures for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a nursing-home-care unit.

Authors:  D L Sewell; S A Potter; C M Jacobson; L J Strausbaugh; T T Ward
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Control of endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a cost-benefit analysis in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  C Chaix; I Durand-Zaleski; C Alberti; C Brun-Buisson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Elimination of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from a university hospital and district institutions, Finland.

Authors:  Pirkko Kotilainen; Marianne Routamaa; Reijo Peltonen; Jarmo Oksi; Esa Rintala; Olli Meurman; Olli-Pekka Lehtonen; Erkki Eerola; Saara Salmenlinna; Jaana Vuopio-Varkila; Tuire Rossi
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci.

Authors:  A Huletsky; R Giroux; V Rossbach; M Gagnon; M Vaillancourt; M Bernier; F Gagnon; K Truchon; M Bastien; F J Picard; A van Belkum; M Ouellette; P H Roy; M G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara E Cosgrove; George Sakoulas; Eli N Perencevich; Mitchell J Schwaber; Adolf W Karchmer; Yehuda Carmeli
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-12-13       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitals and the community: stealth dynamics and control catastrophes.

Authors:  B S Cooper; G F Medley; S P Stone; C C Kibbler; B D Cookson; J A Roberts; G Duckworth; R Lai; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Cassandra D Salgado; Barry M Farr; David P Calfee
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01-03       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  34 in total

1.  Evaluation of the BD GeneOhm assay using the rotor-gene 6000 platform for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from pooled screening swabs.

Authors:  Melvyn Howard Smith; Julian Hodgson; Ian Joseph Eltringham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay on the SmartCycler real-time PCR platform for rapid detection of MRSA from screening specimens.

Authors:  A S Rossney; C M Herra; M M Fitzgibbon; P M Morgan; M J Lawrence; B O'Connell
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection: comparison of two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR assay) with three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA) for use with infection-control swabs.

Authors:  S J van Hal; D Stark; B Lockwood; D Marriott; J Harkness
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of two versions of the IDI-MRSA assay using charcoal swabs for prospective nasal and nonnasal surveillance samples.

Authors:  Sean X Zhang; Steven J Drews; Joanne Tomassi; Kevin C Katz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Performance of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus test before and during high-volume clinical use.

Authors:  Suzanne M Paule; Donna M Hacek; Bridget Kufner; Karine Truchon; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul; Ari Robicsek; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of three molecular assays for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Patrice Francois; Manuela Bento; Gesuele Renzi; Stephan Harbarth; Didier Pittet; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Current trends in rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant enterococcus species.

Authors:  Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Kelly Haccuria; Mindy Michiels; Margareta Ieven; Claire Poyart; Waleria Hryniewicz; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of chromogenic media to BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR for detection of MRSA in nasal swabs.

Authors:  Larry J Bischof; Linda Lapsley; Karen Fontecchio; Dollie Jacosalem; Carol Young; Rosemary Hankerd; Duane W Newton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Surveillance cultures for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: diagnostic yield of anatomic sites and comparison of provider- and patient-collected samples.

Authors:  Ebbing Lautenbach; Irving Nachamkin; Baofeng Hu; Neil O Fishman; Pam Tolomeo; Priya Prasad; Warren B Bilker; Theoklis E Zaoutis
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.