Literature DB >> 17626166

Performance of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus test before and during high-volume clinical use.

Suzanne M Paule1, Donna M Hacek, Bridget Kufner, Karine Truchon, Richard B Thomson, Karen L Kaul, Ari Robicsek, Lance R Peterson.   

Abstract

We evaluated the use of the BD GeneOhm MRSA real-time PCR assay (BD Diagnostics, San Diego, CA) for the detection of nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The initial evaluation consisted of 403 paired nasal swabs and was done using the specimen preparation provided with the kit and an in-house lysis method that was specifically developed to accommodate large-volume testing using a minimal amount of personnel time. One swab was placed in an achromopeptidase (ACP) lysis solution, and the other was first used for culture and then prepared according to the kit protocol. PCR was performed on both lysates, and results were compared to those for culture. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the PCR assay were 98%, 96%, 77%, and 99.7% with the kit lysate and 98%, 95%, 75%, and 99.7% with the ACP lysate (P, not significant), respectively. The second evaluation was done after implementation of all-admission surveillance using PCR with ACP lysis and a sampling of 1,107 PCR-negative samples and 215 PCR-positive samples that were confirmed by culture. The results of this sampling showed an NPV of 99.9% and a PPV of 73.5% (prevalence, 6%), consistent with our initial findings. The BD GeneOhm MRSA assay is an accurate and rapid way to detect MRSA nasal colonization. When one is dealing with large specimen numbers, the ACP lysis method offers easier processing without negatively affecting the sensitivity or specificity of the PCR assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17626166      PMCID: PMC2045305          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00670-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  30 in total

1.  Microbiologic surveillance using nasal cultures alone is sufficient for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in neonates.

Authors:  Kamaljit Singh; Patrick J Gavin; Thomas Vescio; Richard B Thomson Jr; Ruth B Deddish; Adrienne Fisher; Gary A Noskin; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection after previous infection or colonization.

Authors:  Susan S Huang; Richard Platt
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01-17       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Efficient detection and long-term persistence of the carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M D Sanford; A F Widmer; M J Bale; R N Jones; R P Wenzel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 4.  The commonality of risk factors for nosocomial colonization and infection with antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus, gram-negative bacilli, Clostridium difficile, and Candida.

Authors:  Nasia Safdar; Dennis G Maki
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Comparison of culture screening methods for detection of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a prospective study comparing 32 methods.

Authors:  Nasia Safdar; Leah Narans; Barbara Gordon; Dennis G Maki
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Natural history of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in soldiers.

Authors:  Michael W Ellis; Duane R Hospenthal; David P Dooley; Paula J Gray; Clinton K Murray
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization at hospital admission and its effect on subsequent MRSA infection.

Authors:  Kepler A Davis; Justin J Stewart; Helen K Crouch; Christopher E Florez; Duane R Hospenthal
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci.

Authors:  A Huletsky; R Giroux; V Rossbach; M Gagnon; M Vaillancourt; M Bernier; F Gagnon; K Truchon; M Bastien; F J Picard; A van Belkum; M Ouellette; P H Roy; M G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus from adult and neonate nasal swab specimens using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Suzanne M Paule; Anna C Pasquariello; Donna M Hacek; Adrienne G Fisher; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Cassandra D Salgado; Barry M Farr; David P Calfee
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01-03       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  46 in total

1.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Current trends in rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant enterococcus species.

Authors:  Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Kelly Haccuria; Mindy Michiels; Margareta Ieven; Claire Poyart; Waleria Hryniewicz; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of chromogenic media to BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR for detection of MRSA in nasal swabs.

Authors:  Larry J Bischof; Linda Lapsley; Karen Fontecchio; Dollie Jacosalem; Carol Young; Rosemary Hankerd; Duane W Newton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  MVPlex assay for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in naris and other swab specimens.

Authors:  Raymond P Podzorski; Haijing Li; Jian Han; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  A common variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IVa in isolates from Copenhagen, Denmark, is not detected by the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus assay.

Authors:  Mette Damkjaer Bartels; Kit Boye; Susanne Mie Rohde; Anders Rhod Larsen; Herbert Torfs; Peggy Bouchy; Robert Skov; Henrik Westh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Automation of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus assay for high-throughput screening of nasal swab specimens.

Authors:  Xue-Ping Wang; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Multicenter evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) test as a rapid screening method for detection of MRSA in nares.

Authors:  D M Wolk; E Picton; D Johnson; T Davis; P Pancholi; C C Ginocchio; S Finegold; D F Welch; M de Boer; D Fuller; M C Solomon; B Rogers; M S Mehta; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  To screen or not to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Lance R Peterson; Daniel J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  MRSA detection: comparison of two molecular methods (BD GeneOhm PCR assay and Easy-Plex) with two selective MRSA agars (MRSA-ID and Oxoid MRSA) for nasal swabs.

Authors:  S J van Hal; Z Jennings; D Stark; D Marriott; J Harkness
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  Rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: current status.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.074

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.