Literature DB >> 18031689

Long-term speeding in perceptual switches mediated by attention-dependent plasticity in cortical visual processing.

Satoru Suzuki1, Marcia Grabowecky.   

Abstract

Binocular rivalry has been extensively studied to understand the mechanisms that control switches in visual awareness and much has been revealed about the contributions of stimulus and cognitive factors. Because visual processes are fundamentally adaptive, however, it is also important to understand how experience alters the dynamics of perceptual switches. When observers viewed binocular rivalry repeatedly over many days, the rate of perceptual switches increased as much as 3-fold. This long-term rivalry speeding exhibited a pattern of image-feature specificity that ruled out primary contributions from strategic and nonsensory factors and implicated neural plasticity occurring in both low- and high-level visual processes in the ventral stream. Furthermore, the speeding occurred only when the rivaling patterns were voluntarily attended, suggesting that the underlying neural plasticity selectively engages when stimuli are behaviorally relevant. Long-term rivalry speeding may thus reflect broader mechanisms that facilitate quick assessments of signals that contain multiple behaviorally relevant interpretations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18031689     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  18 in total

Review 1.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Further support for the importance of the suppressive signal (pull) during the push-pull perceptual training.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Revealing boundary-contour based surface representation through the time course of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Perceptual training profoundly alters binocular rivalry through both sensory and attentional enhancements.

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Experience-driven plasticity in binocular vision.

Authors:  P Christiaan Klink; Jan W Brascamp; Randolph Blake; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  The magnitude and dynamics of interocular suppression affected by monocular boundary contour and conflicting local features.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  A binocular perimetry study of the causes and implications of sensory eye dominance.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Does visual attention drive the dynamics of bistable perception?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jan Brascamp; Duje Tadin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Rewards evoke learning of unconsciously processed visual stimuli in adult humans.

Authors:  Aaron R Seitz; Dongho Kim; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations.

Authors:  J W Brascamp; J Pearson; R Blake; A V van den Berg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.