Literature DB >> 27791061

Perceptual training profoundly alters binocular rivalry through both sensory and attentional enhancements.

Kevin C Dieter1,2,3,4, Michael D Melnick3,4, Duje Tadin5,4,6.   

Abstract

The effects of attention, as well as its functional utility, are particularly prominent when selecting among multiple stimuli that compete for processing resources. However, existing studies have found that binocular rivalry-a phenomenon characterized by perceptual competition between incompatible stimuli presented to the two eyes-is only modestly influenced by selective attention. Here, we demonstrate that the relative resistance of binocular rivalry to selective modulations gradually erodes over the course of extended perceptual training that uses a demanding, feature-based attentional task. The final result was a dramatic alteration in binocular rivalry dynamics, leading to profound predominance of the trained stimulus. In some cases, trained observers saw the trained rival image nearly exclusively throughout 4-min viewing periods. This large change in binocular rivalry predominance was driven by two factors: task-independent, eye-specific changes in visual processing, as well as an enhanced ability of attention to promote predominance of the task-relevant stimulus. Notably, this strengthening of task-driven attention also exhibited eye specificity above and beyond that from observed sensory processing changes. These empirical results, along with simulations from a recently developed model of interocular suppression, reveal that stimulus predominance during binocular rivalry can be realized both through an eye-specific boost in processing of sensory information and through facilitated deployment of attention to task-relevant features in the trained eye. Our findings highlight the interplay of attention and binocular rivalry at multiple visual processing stages and reveal that sustained training can substantially alter early visual mechanisms.

Keywords:  binocular rivalry; perceptual learning; visual attention; visual plasticity

Year:  2016        PMID: 27791061      PMCID: PMC5111677          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1602722113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  33 in total

1.  AIC model selection using Akaike weights.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Simon Farrell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

2.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.

Authors:  Ming Meng; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Voluntary attention modulates processing of eye-specific visual information.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Yi Jiang; Sheng He
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-02-02

4.  Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks.

Authors:  O L Carter; D E Presti; C Callistemon; Y Ungerer; G B Liu; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Long-term speeding in perceptual switches mediated by attention-dependent plasticity in cortical visual processing.

Authors:  Satoru Suzuki; Marcia Grabowecky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  The role of sensory ocular dominance on through-focus visual performance in monovision presbyopia corrections.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; Aixa Alarcon; Kevin C Dieter; Duje Tadin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  When can attention influence binocular rivalry?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 10.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation.

Authors:  Matteo Carandini; David J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  6 in total

1.  Towards a whole brain model of Perceptual Learning.

Authors:  Marcello Maniglia; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-12-13

2.  Shifting eye balance using monocularly directed attention in normal vision.

Authors:  Sandy P Wong; Alex S Baldwin; Robert F Hess; Kathy T Mullen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Seeing Double: Exploring the Phenomenology of Self-Reported Absence of Rivalry in Bistable Pictures.

Authors:  Elisa Filevich; Maxi Becker; Yuan-Hao Wu; Simone Kühn
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jeroen Ja van Boxtel; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Matthew J Davidson; David Alais
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Emotion Words' Effect on Visual Awareness and Attention of Emotional Faces.

Authors:  Jennifer M B Fugate; Cameron MacDonald; Aminda J O'Hare
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-15

6.  An algorithmic information theory of consciousness.

Authors:  Giulio Ruffini
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2017-10-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.