Literature DB >> 19757942

Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations.

J W Brascamp1, J Pearson, R Blake, A V van den Berg.   

Abstract

When viewing a stimulus that has multiple plausible real-world interpretations, perception alternates between these interpretations every few seconds. Alternations can be halted by intermittently removing the stimulus from view. The same interpretation dominates over many successive presentations, and perception stabilizes. Here we study perception during long sessions of such intermittent presentation. We demonstrate that, rather than causing truly stable perception, intermittent presentation gives rise to a perceptual alternation cycle with its own characteristics and dependencies, different from those during continuous presentation. Alternations during intermittent viewing typically occur once every few minutes--much less frequently than the seconds-scale alternations during continuous viewing. Strikingly, alternations during intermittent viewing occur at fairly regular intervals, making for a surprisingly periodic alternation cycle. The duration of this cycle becomes longer as the blank duration between presentations is increased, reaching dozens of minutes in some cases. We interpret our findings in terms of a mathematical model that describes a neural network with competition between alternative interpretations. Network sensitivities depend on prior dominance, thus providing a memory for past perception. Slow changes in sensitivity produce both perceptual stabilization and the regular but infrequent alternations, meaning that the same memory traces are responsible for both. This model provides a good description of psychophysical findings, and offers several indications regarding their neural basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19757942      PMCID: PMC2755061          DOI: 10.1167/9.3.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  64 in total

1.  Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli.

Authors:  Xiangchuan Chen; Sheng He
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Competition in bistable vision is attribute-specific.

Authors:  Jon K Grossmann; Allan C Dobbins
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Attention speeds binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; David Alais; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

5.  Long-term speeding in perceptual switches mediated by attention-dependent plasticity in cortical visual processing.

Authors:  Satoru Suzuki; Marcia Grabowecky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits.

Authors:  Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision.

Authors:  P C Klink; R van Ee; M M Nijs; G J Brouwer; A J Noest; R J A van Wezel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Short-term synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Robert S Zucker; Wade G Regehr
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.318

10.  Binocular rivalry is not chaotic.

Authors:  S R Lehky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-01-23       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  22 in total

1.  Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness.

Authors:  David Alais; John Cass; Robert P O'Shea; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Generalization of cue recruitment to non-moving stimuli: location and surface-texture contingent biases for 3-D shape perception.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A trained perceptual bias that lasts for weeks.

Authors:  Sarah J Harrison; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Does visual attention drive the dynamics of bistable perception?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jan Brascamp; Duje Tadin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Untangling perceptual memory: hysteresis and adaptation map into separate cortical networks.

Authors:  Caspar M Schwiedrzik; Christian C Ruff; Andreea Lazar; Frauke C Leitner; Wolf Singer; Lucia Melloni
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Dynamics of temporally interleaved percept-choice sequences: interaction via adaptation in shared neural populations.

Authors:  André J Noest; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 7.  Binocular vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Hugh Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Perceptual experience modulates cortical circuits involved in visual awareness.

Authors:  Maartje C de Jong; Zoe Kourtzi; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Bistable perception modeled as competing stochastic integrations at two levels.

Authors:  Guido Gigante; Maurizio Mattia; Jochen Braun; Paolo Del Giudice
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Human middle temporal cortex, perceptual bias, and perceptual memory for ambiguous three-dimensional motion.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Ryota Kanai; Vincent Walsh; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.