Literature DB >> 20674360

Experience-driven plasticity in binocular vision.

P Christiaan Klink1, Jan W Brascamp, Randolph Blake, Richard J A van Wezel.   

Abstract

Experience-driven neuronal plasticity allows the brain to adapt its functional connectivity to recent sensory input. Here we use binocular rivalry, an experimental paradigm in which conflicting images are presented to the individual eyes, to demonstrate plasticity in the neuronal mechanisms that convert visual information from two separated retinas into single perceptual experiences. Perception during binocular rivalry tended to initially consist of alternations between exclusive representations of monocularly defined images, but upon prolonged exposure, mixture percepts became more prevalent. The completeness of suppression, reflected in the incidence of mixture percepts, plausibly reflects the strength of inhibition that likely plays a role in binocular rivalry. Recovery of exclusivity was possible but required highly specific binocular stimulation. Documenting the prerequisites for these observed changes in perceptual exclusivity, our experiments suggest experience-driven plasticity at interocular inhibitory synapses, driven by the correlated activity (and also the lack thereof) of neurons representing the conflicting stimuli. This form of plasticity is consistent with a previously proposed but largely untested anti-Hebbian learning mechanism for inhibitory synapses in vision. Our results implicate experience-driven plasticity as one governing principle in the neuronal organization of binocular vision. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20674360      PMCID: PMC2926173          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  38 in total

Review 1.  Visual competition.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Development of cortical circuits: lessons from ocular dominance columns.

Authors:  Lawrence C Katz; Justin C Crowley
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Cell-specific, spike timing-dependent plasticities in the dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Thanos Tzounopoulos; Yuil Kim; Donata Oertel; Laurence O Trussell
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-20       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Storage for free: a surprising property of a simple gain-control model of motion aftereffects.

Authors:  Wim A van de Grind; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Hebb and anti-Hebb meet in the brainstem.

Authors:  Sacha B Nelson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision.

Authors:  Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Forming sparse representations by local anti-Hebbian learning.

Authors:  P Földiák
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Storage of spatially specific threshold elevation.

Authors:  P G Thompson; J A Movshon
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Adaptation of the binocular rivalry mechanism.

Authors:  M Hollins; K Hudnell
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression.

Authors:  M Hollins
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-06
View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Distinct mechanism for long-term contrast adaptation.

Authors:  Min Bao; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Binocular rivalry transitions predict inattention symptom severity in adult ADHD.

Authors:  Aiste Jusyte; Natalia Zaretskaya; Nina Maria Höhnle; Andreas Bartels; Michael Schönenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  The role of frontal and parietal brain areas in bistable perception.

Authors:  Tomas Knapen; Jan Brascamp; Joel Pearson; Raymond van Ee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Role of mutual inhibition in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jeffrey Seely; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Perceptual training profoundly alters binocular rivalry through both sensory and attentional enhancements.

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Symmetry of generalized rivalry network models determines patterns of interocular grouping in four-location binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Martin Golubitsky; Yukai Zhao; Yunjiao Wang; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Perceptual experience modulates cortical circuits involved in visual awareness.

Authors:  Maartje C de Jong; Zoe Kourtzi; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Vaama Patel; Sjoerd Stuit; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

10.  Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jocelyn L Sy; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.