Literature DB >> 17997635

From filters to features: scale-space analysis of edge and blur coding in human vision.

Mark A Georgeson1, Keith A May, Tom C A Freeman, Gillian S Hesse.   

Abstract

To make vision possible, the visual nervous system must represent the most informative features in the light pattern captured by the eye. Here we use Gaussian scale-space theory to derive a multiscale model for edge analysis and we test it in perceptual experiments. At all scales there are two stages of spatial filtering. An odd-symmetric, Gaussian first derivative filter provides the input to a Gaussian second derivative filter. Crucially, the output at each stage is half-wave rectified before feeding forward to the next. This creates nonlinear channels selectively responsive to one edge polarity while suppressing spurious or "phantom" edges. The two stages have properties analogous to simple and complex cells in the visual cortex. Edges are found as peaks in a scale-space response map that is the output of the second stage. The position and scale of the peak response identify the location and blur of the edge. The model predicts remarkably accurately our results on human perception of edge location and blur for a wide range of luminance profiles, including the surprising finding that blurred edges look sharper when their length is made shorter. The model enhances our understanding of early vision by integrating computational, physiological, and psychophysical approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17997635     DOI: 10.1167/7.13.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  18 in total

1.  Adaptation to astigmatic blur.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Michael Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Perceived contrast in complex images.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Features and the 'primal sketch'.

Authors:  Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Impact of primary spherical aberration, spatial frequency and Stiles Crawford apodization on wavefront determined refractive error: a computational study.

Authors:  Renfeng Xu; Arthur Bradley; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Response normalization and blur adaptation: data and multi-scale model.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Mark A Georgeson; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  A cyclopean neural mechanism compensating for optical differences between the eyes.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Carlos Dorronsoro; Lucie Sawides; Michael A Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Adaptation to interocular differences in blur.

Authors:  Elysse Kompaniez; Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  What is visible across the visual field?

Authors:  Andrew M Haun
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2021-06-01

9.  Creating effective focus cues in multi-plane 3D displays.

Authors:  Sowmya Ravikumar; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Perceived blur in naturally contoured images depends on phase.

Authors:  Stephanie Murray; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.