Literature DB >> 23683093

Impact of primary spherical aberration, spatial frequency and Stiles Crawford apodization on wavefront determined refractive error: a computational study.

Renfeng Xu1, Arthur Bradley, Larry N Thibos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that pupil apodization is the basis for central pupil bias of spherical refractions in eyes with spherical aberration.
METHODS: We employed Fourier computational optics in which we vary spherical aberration levels, pupil size, and pupil apodization (Stiles Crawford Effect) within the pupil function, from which point spread functions and optical transfer functions were computed. Through-focus analysis determined the refractive correction that optimized retinal image quality.
RESULTS: For a large pupil (7 mm), as spherical aberration levels increase, refractions that optimize the visual Strehl ratio mirror refractions that maximize high spatial frequency modulation in the image and both focus a near paraxial region of the pupil. These refractions are not affected by Stiles Crawford Effect apodization. Refractions that optimize low spatial frequency modulation come close to minimizing wavefront RMS, and vary with level of spherical aberration and Stiles Crawford Effect. In the presence of significant levels of spherical aberration (e.g. C(4)(0) = 0.4 μm, 7 mm pupil), low spatial frequency refractions can induce -0.7 D myopic shift compared to high SF refraction, and refractions that maximize image contrast of a three cycle per degree square-wave grating can cause -0.75 D myopic drift relative to refractions that maximize image sharpness. DISCUSSION: Because of small depth of focus associated with high spatial frequency stimuli, the large change in dioptric power across the pupil caused by spherical aberration limits the effective aperture contributing to the image of high spatial frequencies. Thus, when imaging high spatial frequencies, spherical aberration effectively induces an annular aperture defining that portion of the pupil contributing to a well-focused image. As spherical focus is manipulated during the refraction procedure, the dimensions of the annular aperture change. Image quality is maximized when the inner radius of the induced annulus falls to zero, thus defining a circular near paraxial region of the pupil that determines refraction outcome.
© 2013 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2013 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23683093      PMCID: PMC4056778          DOI: 10.1111/opo.12072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  38 in total

1.  A statistical model of the aberration structure of normal, well-corrected eyes.

Authors:  Larry N Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Xin Hong
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Scaling Zernike expansion coefficients to different pupil sizes.

Authors:  Jim Schwiegerling
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Accommodation and night myopia.

Authors:  J M OTERO; M AGUILAR
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1951-12

4.  Optimizing the subjective depth-of-focus with combinations of fourth- and sixth-order spherical aberration.

Authors:  Yohann Benard; Norberto Lopez-Gil; Richard Legras
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The relationship of visual acuity, refractive error, and pupil size after radial keratotomy.

Authors:  J T Holladay; M J Lynn; G O Waring; M Gemmill; G C Keehn; B Fielding
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-01

6.  Corneal asphericity and spherical aberration after refractive surgery.

Authors:  Katia M Bottos; Mauro T Leite; Marichelle Aventura-Isidro; Jennifer Bernabe-Ko; Noppamas Wongpitoonpiya; Nikki Heidi Ong-Camara; Tracy L Purcell; David J Schanzlin
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 7.  Spherical aberration of the reduced schematic eye with elliptical refracting surface.

Authors:  L N Thibos; M Ye; X Zhang; A Bradley
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Properties of annular artificial pupils.

Authors:  W N Charman; J A Jennings
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Parametric representation of Stiles-Crawford functions: normal variation of peak location and directionality.

Authors:  R A Applegate; V Lakshminarayanan
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  The refraction of the eye in the relation to spherical aberration and pupil size.

Authors:  W N Charman; J A Jennings; H Whitefoot
Journal:  Br J Physiol Opt       Date:  1978
View more
  12 in total

1.  Impact of pupil transmission apodization on presbyopic through-focus visual performance with spherical aberration.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; HaeWon Jung; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Improving vision by pupil masking.

Authors:  Sergio Bonaque-González; Susana Ríos-Rodríguez; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Influence of spherical aberration, stimulus spatial frequency, and pupil apodisation on subjective refractions.

Authors:  Arthur Bradley; Renfeng Xu; Larry Thibos; Gildas Marin; Martha Hernandez
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Retinal image quality during accommodation in adult myopic eyes.

Authors:  Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan; Emily Aslakson; Andrew Kornaus; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Impact of contact lens zone geometry and ocular optics on bifocal retinal image quality.

Authors:  Arthur Bradley; Jayoung Nam; Renfeng Xu; Leslie Harman; Larry Thibos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Retinal image quality during accommodation.

Authors:  Norberto López-Gil; Jesson Martin; Tao Liu; Arthur Bradley; David Díaz-Muñoz; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Image Quality Analysis of Eyes Undergoing LASER Refractive Surgery.

Authors:  Samrat Sarkar; Pravin Krishna Vaddavalli; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The effect of spherical aberration on visual performance and refractive state for stimuli and tasks typical of night viewing.

Authors:  Iván Marín-Franch; Renfeng Xu; Arthur Bradley; Larry N Thibos; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-12-29

9.  Lags and leads of accommodation in humans: Fact or fiction?

Authors:  Vivek Labhishetty; Steven A Cholewiak; Austin Roorda; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Individual neural transfer function affects the prediction of subjective depth of focus.

Authors:  Alexander Leube; Tim Schilling; Arne Ohlendorf; David Kern; Alex G Ochakovski; M Dominik Fischer; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.