Literature DB >> 17971317

Environmental motion delays the detection of movement-based signals.

Richard A Peters1.   

Abstract

Animal signals are constrained by the environment in which they are transmitted and the sensory systems of receivers. Detection of movement-based signals is particularly challenging against the background of wind-blown plants. The Australian lizard Amphibolurus muricatus has recently been shown to compensate for greater plant motion by prolonging the introductory tail-flicking component of its movement-based display. Here I demonstrate that such modifications to signal structure are useful because environmental motion lengthens the time lizard receivers take to detect tail flicks. The spatio-temporal properties of animal signals and environmental motion are thus sufficiently similar to make signal detection more difficult. Environmental motion, therefore, must have had an influence on the evolution of movement-based signals and motion detection mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17971317      PMCID: PMC2412918          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  12 in total

1.  Characterising temporal delay filters in biological motion detectors.

Authors:  M R Ibbotson; C W Clifford
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual form created solely from temporal structure.

Authors:  S H Lee; R Blake
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Fundamental mechanisms of visual motion detection: models, cells and functions.

Authors:  C W G Clifford; M R Ibbotson
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  Figure-ground segregation can rely on differences in motion direction.

Authors:  Farid I Kandil; Manfred Fahle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Active space of a movement-based signal: response to the Jacky dragon (Amphibolurus muricatus) display is sensitive to distance, but independent of orientation.

Authors:  Richard A Peters; Christopher S Evans
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Lizards speed up visual displays in noisy motion habitats.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Richard A Peters; Barbara Clucas; Judy A Stamps
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Image motion environments: background noise for movement-based animal signals.

Authors:  Richard Peters; Jan Hemmi; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  A glimpse into crabworld.

Authors:  J Zeil; J M Zanker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Motion detection in the presence and absence of background motion in an Anolis lizard.

Authors:  L J Fleishman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Introductory tail-flick of the Jacky dragon visual display: signal efficacy depends upon duration.

Authors:  Richard A Peters; Christopher S Evans
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Social complexity as a proximate and ultimate factor in communicative complexity.

Authors:  Todd M Freeberg; Robin I M Dunbar; Terry J Ord
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Is sociality required for the evolution of communicative complexity? Evidence weighed against alternative hypotheses in diverse taxonomic groups.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Joan Garcia-Porta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Image motion environments: background noise for movement-based animal signals.

Authors:  Richard Peters; Jan Hemmi; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Alert signals enhance animal communication in "noisy" environments.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Judy A Stamps
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dazzle coloration and prey movement.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Daniella H Yule; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Modeling and measuring the visual detection of ecologically relevant motion by an Anolis lizard.

Authors:  Adam C Pallus; Leo J Fleishman; Philip M Castonguay
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Coevolution of social and communicative complexity in lemurs.

Authors:  Claudia Fichtel; Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 6.671

8.  Ontogenetic Change of Signal Brightness in the Foot-Flagging Frog Species Staurois parvus and Staurois guttatus.

Authors:  Judith Stangel; Doris Preininger; Marc Sztatecsny; Walter Hödl
Journal:  Herpetologica       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 1.676

9.  Do singing rock hyraxes exploit conspecific calls to gain attention?

Authors:  Amiyaal Ilany; Adi Barocas; Lee Koren; Michael Kam; Eli Geffen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interpopulational and seasonal variation in the chemical signals of the lizard Gallotia galloti.

Authors:  Roberto García-Roa; Rodrigo Megía-Palma; Jesús Ortega; Manuel Jara; Pilar López; José Martín
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.