Literature DB >> 3806436

Motion detection in the presence and absence of background motion in an Anolis lizard.

L J Fleishman.   

Abstract

Anolis lizards respond to a moving object viewed in the periphery of their visual field by turning their eye to fixate the object with their central fovea. This paper describes the relative effectiveness of different patterns of motion of a small black lure in eliciting these eye movements and the way motion of a backdrop of vegetation affects the response. The stimulus was positioned 45 degrees from the animal's line of gaze and oscillated in the vertical axis at different frequencies between 0.5 and 10 Hz. At each frequency, the amplitude of the oscillation was increased until the lizard flicked its eye towards the stimulus. The minimum amplitude needed for response (0.22 degrees of visual angle) was independent of frequency and waveform. The probability of any response occurring was, however, lower at higher frequencies (7 and 10 Hz) and a 1.5 Hz square wave evoked the greatest proportion of responses. Sinusoidal oscillation of a background of vegetation at 1.6 Hz during or before motion of the stimulus lure reduced the probability of an eye flick but did not raise the minimum amplitude needed for a response. The suppressive effect was greatest when the lure was oscillated at frequencies close to that of the background. It is concluded that Anolis, which rely upon motion to detect objects in the periphery of the visual field, filter out irrelevant motion such as that of windblown vegetation by responding preferentially to particular patterns of motion and short term habituation to commonly present patterns of motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3806436     DOI: 10.1007/bf00612043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  9 in total

1.  Motor function of the tectal and tegmental area.

Authors:  W R HESS; S BUERGI; V BUCHER
Journal:  Monatsschr Psychiatr Neurol       Date:  1946

2.  The comparison of percentages in matched samples.

Authors:  W G COCHRAN
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1950-12       Impact factor: 2.445

3.  Adaptation and habituation characteristics of tectal neurons in the pigeon.

Authors:  E J Woods; B J Frost
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1977-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of moving visual stimulus.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The influence of background motion on the motion aftereffect.

Authors:  A T Smith; M J Musselwhite; P Hammond
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Sensitivity of complex cells in cat striate cortex to relative motion.

Authors:  P Hammond; A T Smith
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-06-03       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction.

Authors:  B J Frost; K Nakayama
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Receptive-field properties in reptilian optic tectum: some comparisons with mammals.

Authors:  B E Stein; N S Gaither
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Bifoveal vision in anolis lizards.

Authors:  K V Fite; B C Lister
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.808

  9 in total
  20 in total

1.  Design of the Jacky dragon visual display: signal and noise characteristics in a complex moving environment.

Authors:  R A Peters; C S Evans
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Motion perception and visual signal design in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Leo J Fleishman; Adam C Pallus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Environmental motion delays the detection of movement-based signals.

Authors:  Richard A Peters
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Image motion environments: background noise for movement-based animal signals.

Authors:  Richard Peters; Jan Hemmi; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Change your diet or die: predator-induced shifts in insectivorous lizard feeding ecology.

Authors:  Dror Hawlena; Valentín Pérez-Mellado
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Alert signals enhance animal communication in "noisy" environments.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Judy A Stamps
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Habitat light and dewlap color diversity in four species of Puerto Rican anoline lizards.

Authors:  Leo J Fleishman; Manuel Leal; Matthew H Persons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Modeling and measuring the visual detection of ecologically relevant motion by an Anolis lizard.

Authors:  Adam C Pallus; Leo J Fleishman; Philip M Castonguay
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 9.  Selective attention without a neocortex.

Authors:  Richard J Krauzlis; Amarender R Bogadhi; James P Herman; Anil Bollimunta
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Long-range neural inhibition and stimulus competition in the archerfish optic tectum.

Authors:  Svetlana Volotsky; Ehud Vinepinsky; Opher Donchin; Ronen Segev
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.