Literature DB >> 18700203

Dazzle coloration and prey movement.

Martin Stevens1, Daniella H Yule, Graeme D Ruxton.   

Abstract

Many traits in animals reduce the rate of attack from visually hunting predators, including camouflage, warning signals and mimicry. In addition, some animal markings may reduce the likelihood that an attack ends in successful capture. These might include dazzle markings, high-contrast patterns that make the estimation of speed and trajectory difficult. However, until now, no study has experimentally tested whether some markings may achieve such an effect. We developed a computer 'game' where human 'predators' have to capture computer-generated prey moving across a background. In two experiments, we find that although uniform camouflaged targets were among the hardest to capture, so were a range of high-contrast conspicuous patterns, such as bands and zigzags. Prey were also more difficult to capture against more heterogeneous than uniform backgrounds, and at faster speeds of movement. As such, we find the first experimental evidence that conspicuous patterns, similar to those found in a wide range of real animals, make the capture of moving prey more challenging. Various anti-predator markings may work prey during motion, and some animals may combine such dazzle patterns with other functions, such as camouflage, thermoregulation, sexual and warning signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18700203      PMCID: PMC2605810          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  12 in total

1.  Textured backgrounds alter perceived speed.

Authors:  M R Blakemore; R J Snowden
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Communication and camouflage with the same 'bright' colours in reef fishes.

Authors:  N J Marshall
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The evolution of locomotory behavior in profitable and unprofitable simulated prey.

Authors:  Thomas N Sherratt; Arash Rashed; Christopher D Beatty
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Moving objects appear to slow down at low contrasts.

Authors:  Stuart Anstis
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul

5.  Absolute versus per unit body length speed of prey as an estimator of vulnerability to predation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Environmental motion delays the detection of movement-based signals.

Authors:  Richard A Peters
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 7.  Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration.

Authors:  Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Contrast affects flicker and speed perception differently.

Authors:  P Thompson; L S Stone
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Erratic display as a device against predators.

Authors:  D A Humphries; P M Driver
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Looking at Op Art from a computational viewpoint.

Authors:  Johannes M Zanker
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2004
View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Motion dazzle: a locust's eye view.

Authors:  Roger D Santer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Testing Thayer's hypothesis: can camouflage work by distraction?

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Julia Graham; Isabel S Winney; Abi Cantor
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Cuttlefish camouflage: context-dependent body pattern use during motion.

Authors:  S Zylinski; D Osorio; A J Shohet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Interference coloration as an anti-predator defence.

Authors:  Thomas W Pike
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Diverted by dazzle: perceived movement direction is biased by target pattern orientation.

Authors:  Anna E Hughes; Christian Jones; Kaustuv Joshi; David J Tolhurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  How camouflage works.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Unravelling the illusion of flicker fusion.

Authors:  Diana Umeton; Jenny C A Read; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Contrasting stripes are a widespread feature of group living in birds, mammals and fishes.

Authors:  Juan J Negro; Jorge Doña; M Carmen Blázquez; Airam Rodríguez; James E Herbert-Read; M de L Brooke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Motion dazzle and camouflage as distinct anti-predator defenses.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; W Tom L Searle; Jenny E Seymour; Kate L A Marshall; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.