Literature DB >> 17264059

Lizards speed up visual displays in noisy motion habitats.

Terry J Ord1, Richard A Peters, Barbara Clucas, Judy A Stamps.   

Abstract

Extensive research over the last few decades has revealed that many acoustically communicating animals compensate for the masking effect of background noise by changing the structure of their signals. Familiar examples include birds using acoustic properties that enhance the transmission of vocalizations in noisy habitats. Here, we show that the effects of background noise on communication signals are not limited to the acoustic modality, and that visual noise from windblown vegetation has an equally important influence on the production of dynamic visual displays. We found that two species of Puerto Rican lizard, Anolis cristatellus and A. gundlachi, increase the speed of body movements used in territorial signalling to apparently improve communication in visually 'noisy' environments of rapidly moving vegetation. This is the first evidence that animals change how they produce dynamic visual signals when communicating in noisy motion habitats. Taken together with previous work on acoustic communication, our results show that animals with very different sensory ecologies can face similar environmental constraints and adopt remarkably similar strategies to overcome these constraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17264059      PMCID: PMC2124473          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  13 in total

1.  Design of the Jacky dragon visual display: signal and noise characteristics in a complex moving environment.

Authors:  R A Peters; C S Evans
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Differences in visual signal design and detectability between allopatric populations of anolis lizards.

Authors:  Manuel Leal
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  A glimpse into crabworld.

Authors:  J Zeil; J M Zanker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Thomas B Smith
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Form emergence and fixation of head bobbing displays in the green anole lizard (Anolis carolinensis): a reptilian model of signal ontogeny.

Authors:  Matthew B Lovern; Thomas A Jenssen
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Ultrasonic communication in frogs.

Authors:  Albert S Feng; Peter M Narins; Chun-He Xu; Wen-Yu Lin; Zu-Lin Yu; Qiang Qiu; Zhi-Min Xu; Jun-Xian Shen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The effects of rain on acoustic communication: tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather.

Authors:  Thierry Lengagne; Peter J B Slater
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey.

Authors:  Henrik Brumm; Katrin Voss; Ireen Köllmer; Dietmar Todt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Introductory tail-flick of the Jacky dragon visual display: signal efficacy depends upon duration.

Authors:  Richard A Peters; Christopher S Evans
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Localisation of an acoustic signal in a noisy environment: the display call of the king penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus.

Authors:  Thierry Aubin; Pierre Jouventin
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Social complexity as a proximate and ultimate factor in communicative complexity.

Authors:  Todd M Freeberg; Robin I M Dunbar; Terry J Ord
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Is sociality required for the evolution of communicative complexity? Evidence weighed against alternative hypotheses in diverse taxonomic groups.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Joan Garcia-Porta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Motion perception and visual signal design in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Leo J Fleishman; Adam C Pallus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Environmental motion delays the detection of movement-based signals.

Authors:  Richard A Peters
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Image motion environments: background noise for movement-based animal signals.

Authors:  Richard Peters; Jan Hemmi; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Alert signals enhance animal communication in "noisy" environments.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Judy A Stamps
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Separating natural responses from experimental artefacts: habitat selection by a diadromous fish species using odours from conspecifics and natural stream water.

Authors:  Robin Hale; Stephen E Swearer; Barbara J Downes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Pollution going multimodal: the complex impact of the human-altered sensory environment on animal perception and performance.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Habitat light and dewlap color diversity in four species of Puerto Rican anoline lizards.

Authors:  Leo J Fleishman; Manuel Leal; Matthew H Persons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Modeling and measuring the visual detection of ecologically relevant motion by an Anolis lizard.

Authors:  Adam C Pallus; Leo J Fleishman; Philip M Castonguay
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.