Literature DB >> 17234608

Active space of a movement-based signal: response to the Jacky dragon (Amphibolurus muricatus) display is sensitive to distance, but independent of orientation.

Richard A Peters1, Christopher S Evans.   

Abstract

The efficacy of any animal signal is constrained by the range over which it remains above the sensory threshold of potential receivers. The spatial area in which reliable detection occurs defines active space; this is influenced by signal structure, the signalling environment and the sensory characteristics of receivers. Identification of the factors influencing active space has provided valuable insights into signal design, particularly in bioacoustics, in which signal distortion and degradation can be easily quantified. In the present study, we consider whether active space can similarly help to explain the design of a movement-based visual signal. The Jacky dragon (Amphibolurus muricatus) threat display is composed of five distinct motor patterns delivered in an obligatory sequence: tail-flicks, backward and forward foreleg waves, a push-up and a 'body-rock'. In contrast to other communication systems, the introductory element is characterized by reduced intensity (average speed) but greater duration than subsequent motor patterns. Furthermore, the tail-flick sweeps a three-dimensional (3D) space around the lizard, whereas the motor patterns that follow are largely restricted to a single plane. Structural properties thus suggest that the active space of the tail-flick might be greater than that of the other motor patterns in the display, which would provide a parsimonious explanation for its use as an alerting component. We tested this prediction in a playback experiment incorporating 3D animations of lizard displays, comparing response probabilities to the factorial combination of three motor patterns, three viewing angles and three distances. Results suggest that the tail-flick does not have a greater active space than other display motor patterns, but that each degrades predictably with distance, thereby providing potential ranging cues. In addition, display components are remarkably robust to variation in receiver orientation, so that efficacy should be maximized in most potential signalling situations. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that duration is the principal determinant of signal efficacy in this system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17234608     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Environmental motion delays the detection of movement-based signals.

Authors:  Richard A Peters
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Feeling the heat: ground squirrels heat their tails to discourage rattlesnake attack.

Authors:  Daniel T Blumstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Receivers limit the prevalence of deception in humans: evidence from diving behaviour in soccer players.

Authors:  Gwendolyn K David; Catriona H Condon; Candice L Bywater; Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos; Robbie S Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Computer-animated stimuli to measure motion sensitivity: constraints on signal design in the Jacky dragon.

Authors:  Kevin L Woo; Guillaume Rieucau; Darren Burke
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.624

5.  What artifice can and cannot tell us about animal behavior.

Authors:  Daniel L Powell; Gil G Rosenthal
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  Technical and conceptual considerations for using animated stimuli in studies of animal behavior.

Authors:  Laura Chouinard-Thuly; Stefanie Gierszewski; Gil G Rosenthal; Simon M Reader; Guillaume Rieucau; Kevin L Woo; Robert Gerlai; Cynthia Tedore; Spencer J Ingley; John R Stowers; Joachim G Frommen; Francine L Dolins; Klaudia Witte
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 2.624

7.  Social interactivity in pigeon courtship behavior.

Authors:  Emma L R Ware; Daniel R Saunders; Nikolaus F Troje
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Properties of an attention-grabbing motion signal: a comparison of tail and body movements in a lizard.

Authors:  Richard A Peters; Jose Ramos
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.389

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.