Literature DB >> 18264712

Image motion environments: background noise for movement-based animal signals.

Richard Peters1, Jan Hemmi, Jochen Zeil.   

Abstract

Understanding the evolution of animal signals has to include consideration of the structure of signal and noise, and the sensory mechanisms that detect the signals. Considerable progress has been made in understanding sounds and colour signals, however, the degree to which movement-based signals are constrained by the particular patterns of environmental image motion is poorly understood. Here we have quantified the image motion generated by wind-blown plants at 12 sites in the coastal habitat of the Australian lizard Amphibolurus muricatus. Sampling across different plant communities and meteorological conditions revealed distinct image motion environments. At all locations, image motion became more directional and apparent speed increased as wind speeds increased. The magnitude of these changes and the spatial distribution of image motion, however, varied between locations probably as a function of plant structure and the topographic location. In addition, we show that the background motion noise depends strongly on the particular depth-structure of the environment and argue that such micro-habitat differences suggest specific strategies to preserve signal efficacy. Movement-based signals and motion processing mechanisms, therefore, may reveal the same type of habitat specific structural variation that we see for signals from other modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18264712     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-008-0317-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  21 in total

1.  Visual form created solely from temporal structure.

Authors:  S H Lee; R Blake
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Design of the Jacky dragon visual display: signal and noise characteristics in a complex moving environment.

Authors:  R A Peters; C S Evans
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Responses of blowfly motion-sensitive neurons to reconstructed optic flow along outdoor flight paths.

Authors:  N Boeddeker; J P Lindemann; M Egelhaaf; J Zeil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Environmental motion delays the detection of movement-based signals.

Authors:  Richard A Peters
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Depth, contrast and view-based homing in outdoor scenes.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stürzl; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Signaling against the wind: modifying motion-signal structure in response to increased noise.

Authors:  Richard A Peters; Jan M Hemmi; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection.

Authors:  J A Endler; A L Basolo
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly's nervous system.

Authors:  M Egelhaaf; A Borst; W Reichardt
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Thomas B Smith
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  The effects of rain on acoustic communication: tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather.

Authors:  Thierry Lengagne; Peter J B Slater
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  8 in total

1.  Motion perception and visual signal design in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Leo J Fleishman; Adam C Pallus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Environmental motion delays the detection of movement-based signals.

Authors:  Richard A Peters
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Variability of a dynamic visual signal: the fiddler crab claw-waving display.

Authors:  Martin J How; Jochen Zeil; Jan M Hemmi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Modeling and measuring the visual detection of ecologically relevant motion by an Anolis lizard.

Authors:  Adam C Pallus; Leo J Fleishman; Philip M Castonguay
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Motion-based signaling in sympatric species of Australian agamid lizards.

Authors:  Jose A Ramos; Richard A Peters
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  How conspicuous are peacock eyespots and other colorful feathers in the eyes of mammalian predators?

Authors:  Suzanne Amador Kane; Yuchao Wang; Rui Fang; Yabin Lu; Roslyn Dakin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Underwater caustics disrupt prey detection by a reef fish.

Authors:  S R Matchette; I C Cuthill; K L Cheney; N J Marshall; N E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Properties of an attention-grabbing motion signal: a comparison of tail and body movements in a lizard.

Authors:  Richard A Peters; Jose Ramos
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.389

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.