Literature DB >> 17965956

Cystine calculi: correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.

Samuel C Kim1, Erin K Burns, James E Lingeman, Ryan F Paterson, James A McAteer, James C Williams.   

Abstract

Cystine stones are often highly resistant to shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), but it has been reported that cystine stones of "rough" morphology are actually quite susceptible to SWL. Based on the observation that rough cystine stones contain void regions that are visible by helical computed tomographic (CT) imaging, we hypothesized that the internal structure of cystine stones would correlate with the susceptibility of stones to SWL. Cystine stones with average diameters between 4 and 7 mm were scanned using micro and helical CT, classified morphologically according to published criteria, and broken in a research electrohydraulic lithotripter, with fragments sieved through a 2 mm mesh every 50 SWs. Stones with regions of low X-ray attenuation visible on helical CT required only 650 +/- 312 SW/g for total comminution, while those that did not show CT-visible internal structure required 1,046 +/- 307 SW/g (mean +/- SD, P < 0.004). In addition, both average and minimum values for CT number (in Hounsfield units, HU) correlated with SW/g to comminution (P < 0.003 and P < 0.0003, respectively), and these relationships were independent of stone size. This study also confirmed the relationship between the morphological criteria of Bhatta et al. (J Urol 142:937-940, 1989) and cystine stone fragility: Rough stones required 609 +/- 244 SW/g (n = 11), smooth stones 1,109 +/- 308 SW/g (n = 8), and stones intermediate in morphology 869 +/- 384 SW/g (n = 7; rough different from smooth, P < 0.005). In conclusion, cystine stones that appeared homogeneous by helical CT required 61% more SWs for comminution than did stones showing regions of low X-ray attenuation. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of using helical CT to identify cystine stones that will be susceptible to SWL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17965956     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-007-0117-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  25 in total

1.  [Cystine lithiasis and extracorporeal lithotripsy].

Authors:  P Conort; J P Leo; F Richard; C Chatelain
Journal:  Ann Urol (Paris)       Date:  1989

2.  Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Javier Van Cauwelaert; Michael R Bailey; David A Lifshitz; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-12

3.  Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Joshua S Neucks; R Jason VonDerHaar; Irina V Pishchalnikova; James C Williams; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Management of kidney stones.

Authors:  Nicole L Miller; James E Lingeman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-03

5.  Management of cystine nephrolithiasis by endourologic methods and shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J M Hernandez-Graulau; W Castaneda-Zuniga; D Hunter; J C Hulbert
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Cystine: helical computerized tomography characterization of rough and smooth calculi in vitro.

Authors:  Samuel C Kim; Erin K Hatt; James E Lingeman; Robert B Nadler; James A McAteer; James C Williams
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Evaluation of the surface roughness of cystine stones using a visible laser diode scattering approach.

Authors:  R Thibert; B Dubuc; M Dufour; R Tawashi
Journal:  Scanning Microsc       Date:  1993-06

8.  Place of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in management of cystine calculi.

Authors:  G Katz; Z Lencovsky; D Pode; A Shapiro; M Caine
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation.

Authors:  K C Saw; J A McAteer; A G Monga; G T Chua; J E Lingeman; J C Williams
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  CT visible internal stone structure, but not Hounsfield unit value, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro.

Authors:  Chad A Zarse; Tariq A Hameed; Molly E Jackson; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; James C Williams
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-06-13
View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Cystinuria: mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Donna J Claes; Elizabeth Jackson
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J Langenauer; P Betschart; L Hechelhammer; S Güsewell; H P Schmid; D S Engeler; D Abt; V Zumstein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Fragility of brushite stones in shock wave lithotripsy: absence of correlation with computerized tomography visible structure.

Authors:  James C Williams; Tariq Hameed; Molly E Jackson; Syed Aftab; Alessia Gambaro; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Urolithiasis: evaluation, dietary factors, and medical management: an update of the 2014 SIU-ICUD international consultation on stone disease.

Authors:  Helene Jung; Sero Andonian; Dean Assimos; Timothy Averch; Petrisor Geavlete; Yasuo Kohjimoto; Andreas Neisius; Joe Philip; Alberto Saita; Hemendra Shah; Palle Jörn Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques.

Authors:  Wayne Brisbane; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Robustness of Textural Features to Predict Stone Fragility Across Computed Tomography Acquisition and Reconstruction Parameters.

Authors:  Taylor Moen; Andrea Ferrero; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 8.  How should patients with cystine stone disease be evaluated and treated in the twenty-first century?

Authors:  Kim Hovgaard Andreassen; Katja Venborg Pedersen; Susanne Sloth Osther; Helene Ulrik Jung; Søren Kissow Lildal; Palle Joern Sloth Osther
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Protein content of human apatite and brushite kidney stones: significant correlation with morphologic measures.

Authors:  Rocky Pramanik; John R Asplin; Molly E Jackson; James C Williams
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-09-09

Review 10.  Cystinuria-a urologist's perspective.

Authors:  Kay Thomas; Kathie Wong; John Withington; Matthew Bultitude; Angela Doherty
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.