Literature DB >> 22819106

Fragility of brushite stones in shock wave lithotripsy: absence of correlation with computerized tomography visible structure.

James C Williams1, Tariq Hameed, Molly E Jackson, Syed Aftab, Alessia Gambaro, Yuri A Pishchalnikov, James E Lingeman, James A McAteer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Brushite stones were imaged in vitro and then broken with shock wave lithotripsy to assess whether stone fragility correlates with internal stone structure visible on helical computerized tomography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 52 brushite calculi were scanned by micro computerized tomography, weighed, hydrated and placed in a radiological phantom. Stones were scanned using a Philips® Brilliance iCT 256 system and images were evaluated for the visibility of internal structural features. The calculi were then treated with shock wave lithotripsy in vitro. The number of shock waves needed to break each stone to completion was recorded.
RESULTS: The number of shock waves needed to break each stone normalized to stone weight did not differ by HU value (p = 0.84) or by computerized tomography visible structures that could be identified consistently by all observers (p = 0.053). Stone fragility correlated highly with stone density and brushite content (each p <0.001). Calculi of almost pure brushite required the most shock waves to break. When all observations of computerized tomography visible structures were used for analysis by logistic fit, computerized tomography visible structure predicted increased stone fragility with an overall area under the ROC curve of 0.64.
CONCLUSIONS: The shock wave lithotripsy fragility of brushite stones did not correlate with internal structure discernible on helical computerized tomography. However, fragility did correlate with stone density and increasing brushite mineral content, consistent with clinical experience with patients with brushite calculi. Thus, current diagnostic computerized tomography technology does not provide a means to predict when brushite stones will break well using shock wave lithotripsy.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22819106      PMCID: PMC3418465          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

1.  [Analysis of gallstones by infrared spectrophotometry. Advantages and limits of the method (author's transl)].

Authors:  M Daudon; M F Protat; R J Reveillaud
Journal:  Ann Biol Clin (Paris)       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 0.459

2.  The clinical implications of brushite calculi.

Authors:  L W Klee; C G Brito; J E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Crystal-associated nephropathy in patients with brushite nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman; Fredric L Coe; Youzhi Shao; Joan H Parks; Sharon B Bledsoe; Carrie L Phillips; Stephen Bonsib; Elaine M Worcester; Andre J Sommer; Sam C Kim; William W Tinmouth; Marc Grynpas
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Clinical implications of abundant calcium phosphate in routinely analyzed kidney stones.

Authors:  Joan H Parks; Elaine M Worcester; Fredric L Coe; Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Characterization of human renal stones with MDCT: advantage of dual energy and limitations due to respiratory motion.

Authors:  Romain Grosjean; Benoît Sauer; Rui Matias Guerra; Michel Daudon; Alain Blum; Jacques Felblinger; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Sex- and age-related composition of 10 617 calculi analyzed by infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  M Daudon; R Donsimoni; C Hennequin; S Fellahi; G Le Moel; M Paris; S Troupel; B Lacour
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1995

7.  Hounsfield units on computed tomography predict calcium stone subtype composition.

Authors:  Sutchin R Patel; George Haleblian; August Zabbo; Gyan Pareek
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Cystine calculi: correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Samuel C Kim; Erin K Burns; James E Lingeman; Ryan F Paterson; James A McAteer; James C Williams
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-10-27

9.  Protein content of human apatite and brushite kidney stones: significant correlation with morphologic measures.

Authors:  Rocky Pramanik; John R Asplin; Molly E Jackson; James C Williams
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-09-09

10.  CT visible internal stone structure, but not Hounsfield unit value, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro.

Authors:  Chad A Zarse; Tariq A Hameed; Molly E Jackson; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; James C Williams
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-06-13
View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantitative Prediction of Stone Fragility From Routine Dual Energy CT: Ex vivo proof of Feasibility.

Authors:  Andrea Ferrero; Juan C Montoya; Lisa E Vaughan; Alice E Huang; Ian O McKeag; Felicity T Enders; James C Williams; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Robustness of Textural Features to Predict Stone Fragility Across Computed Tomography Acquisition and Reconstruction Parameters.

Authors:  Taylor Moen; Andrea Ferrero; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.173

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.