Literature DB >> 16133577

Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy.

James A McAteer1, James C Williams, Robin O Cleveland, Javier Van Cauwelaert, Michael R Bailey, David A Lifshitz, Andrew P Evan.   

Abstract

Artificial stones are used in research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and in assessing lithotripter performance. We have adopted Ultracal-30 gypsum as a model, finding it suitable for SWL studies in vitro, acute animal experiments in which stones are implanted in the kidney, and as a target to compare the in vitro performance of intracorporeal lithotripters. Here we describe the preparation of U-30 stones, their material properties, shock wave (SW) breakage characteristics, and methods used for quantitation of stone fragmentation with this model. Ultracal-30 gypsum cement was mixed 1:1 with water, cast in plastic multi-well plates, then, the stones were liberated by dissolving the plastic with chloroform and stored under water. Stone breakage in SWL was assessed by several methods including measures of the increase in projected surface area of SW-treated stones. Breakage of hydrated stones showed a linear increase in fragment area with increased SW-number and SW-voltage. Stones stored in water for an extended time showed reduced fragility. Dried stones could be rehydrated so that breakage was not different from stones that had never been dry, but stones rehydrated for less than 96 h showed increased fragility to SWs. The physical properties of U-30 stones place them in the range reported for natural stones. U-30 stones in vitro and in vivo showed equivalent response to SW-rate, with approximately 200% greater fragmentation at 30 SW/min compared to 120 SW/min, suggesting that the mechanisms of SW action are similar under both conditions. U-30 stones provide a convenient, reproducible model for SWL research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16133577     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-005-0503-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  16 in total

1.  The impact of the geometry of the lithotriptor aperture on fragmentation effect at extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment.

Authors:  S Westermark; E Nelson; A C Kinn; H Wiksell
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1999-08

2.  A new type of artificial urinary calculi: in vitro study by spiral CT.

Authors:  R Bachmann; D Heimbach; W Kersjes; D Jacobs; H Schild; A Hesse
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 3.  The mechanisms of stone fragmentation in ESWL.

Authors:  W Eisenmenger
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shockwaves.

Authors:  Yuriy A Pishchalnikov; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Tim Colonius; Lawrence A Crum; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Dual-pulse lithotripter accelerates stone fragmentation and reduces cell lysis in vitro.

Authors:  Dahlia L Sokolov; Michael R Bailey; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  In vitro comparison of shock wave lithotripsy machines.

Authors:  J M Teichman; A J Portis; P P Cecconi; W L Bub; R C Endicott; B Denes; M S Pearle; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Finite difference predictions of P-SV wave propagation inside submerged solids. I. Liquid-solid interface conditions.

Authors:  G Dahake; S M Gracewski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Acoustic and mechanical properties of artificial stones in comparison to natural kidney stones.

Authors:  D Heimbach; R Munver; P Zhong; J Jacobs; A Hesse; S C Müller; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The role of stress waves and cavitation in stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Songlin Zhu; Franklin H Cocks; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James C Williams; K Chee Saw; Ryan F Paterson; Erin K Hatt; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  26 in total

1.  Ordnance gelatine as an in vitro tissue simulation scaffold for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  C E Mendez-Probst; M Vanjecek; H Razvi; P A Cadieux
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-10-22

2.  Histotripsy erosion of model urinary calculi.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; Timothy L Hall; Adam D Maxwell; Zhen Xu; Charles A Cain; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; James C Williams; Irina V Pishchalnikova; R Jason Vonderhaar
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Joshua S Neucks; R Jason VonDerHaar; Irina V Pishchalnikova; James C Williams; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  High intensity focused ultrasound lithotripsy with cavitating microbubbles.

Authors:  Shin Yoshizawa; Teiichiro Ikeda; Akira Ito; Ryuhei Ota; Shu Takagi; Yoichiro Matsumoto
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Experimentally validated multiphysics computational model of focusing and shock wave formation in an electromagnetic lithotripter.

Authors:  Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Nathan B Smith; Georgy N Sankin; Walter N Simmons; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  [The future of ESWL].

Authors:  K U Köhrmann; D Neisius; J Rassweiler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Editorial comment: Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  The role of trapped bubbles in kidney stone detection with the color Doppler ultrasound twinkling artifact.

Authors:  Julianna C Simon; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Wayne Kreider; Michael Breshock; James C Williams; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Evaluation of the LithoGold LG-380 lithotripter: in vitro acoustic characterization and assessment of renal injury in the pig model.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; James C Williams; Bret A Connors; Rajash K Handa; James E Lingeman; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.