Literature DB >> 17565491

CT visible internal stone structure, but not Hounsfield unit value, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro.

Chad A Zarse1, Tariq A Hameed, Molly E Jackson, Yuri A Pishchalnikov, James E Lingeman, James A McAteer, James C Williams.   

Abstract

Calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones are often resistant to breakage using shock wave (SW) lithotripsy. It would be useful to identify by computed tomography (CT) those COM stones that are susceptible to SW's. For this study, 47 COM stones (4-10 mm in diameter) were scanned with micro CT to verify composition and also for assessment of heterogeneity (presence of pronounced lobulation, voids, or apatite inclusions) by blinded observers. Stones were then placed in water and scanned using 64-channel helical CT. As with micro CT, heterogeneity was assessed by blinded observers, using high-bone viewing windows. Then stones were broken in a lithotripter (Dornier Doli-50) over 2 mm mesh, and SW's counted. Results showed that classification of stones using micro CT was highly repeatable among observers (kappa = 0.81), and also predictive of stone fragility. Stones graded as homogeneous required 1,874 +/- 821 SW/g for comminution, while stones with visible structure required half as many SW/g, 912 +/- 678. Similarly, when stones were graded by appearance on helical CT, classification was repeatable (kappa = 0.40), and homogeneous stones required more SW's for comminution than did heterogeneous stones (1,702 +/- 993 SW/g, compared to 907 +/- 773). Stone fragility normalized to stone size did not correlate with Hounsfield units (P = 0.85). In conclusion, COM stones of homogeneous structure require almost twice as many SW's to comminute than stones of similar mineral composition that exhibit internal structural features that are visible by CT. This suggests that stone fragility in patients could be predicted using pre-treatment CT imaging. The findings also show that Hounsfield unit values of COM stones did not correlate with stone fragility. Thus, it is stone morphology, rather than X-ray attenuation, which correlates with fragility to SW's in this common stone type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17565491      PMCID: PMC2408919          DOI: 10.1007/s00240-007-0104-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  27 in total

1.  Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting.

Authors:  S Y Nakada; D G Hoff; S Attai; D Heisey; D Blankenbaker; M Pozniak
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Modeling elastic wave propagation in kidney stones with application to shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Robin O Cleveland; Oleg A Sapozhnikov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Javier Van Cauwelaert; Michael R Bailey; David A Lifshitz; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-12

4.  Role of volume and attenuation value histogram of urinary stone on noncontrast helical computed tomography as predictor of fragility by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Soichiro Yoshida; Tetsuo Hayashi; Jun Ikeda; Atsushi Yoshinaga; Rena Ohno; Nobuyuki Ishii; Takemichi Okada; Hisato Osada; Norinari Honda; Takumi Yamada
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Stone analysis.

Authors:  Gernot Schubert
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-02-14

6.  Predictions of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Li-Jen Wang; Yon-Cheong Wong; Cheng-Keng Chuang; Sheng-Hsien Chu; Chih-Shou Chen; Lai-Chu See; Yang-Jen Chiang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Hounsfield unit density accurately predicts ESWL success.

Authors:  William J Magnuson; Kevin M Tomera; Raymond S Lance
Journal:  Alaska Med       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep

8.  Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation.

Authors:  K C Saw; J A McAteer; A G Monga; G T Chua; J E Lingeman; J C Williams
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Matthew T Gettman; Audrey L Rohlinger; Christine M Lohse; David E Patterson; Joseph W Segura
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  A mechanistic analysis of stone fracture in lithotripsy.

Authors:  Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Adam D Maxwell; Brian MacConaghy; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Micro-computed tomography for analysis of urinary calculi.

Authors:  James C Williams; James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-10-22

Review 2.  Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai; J J M de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Predicting the mineral composition of ureteral stone using non-contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Hiroki Ito; Hideyuki Terao; Manabu Kakizoe; Yoshitake Kato; Hitoshi Ishiguro; Hiroji Uemura; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

5.  High-speed video microscopy and numerical modeling of bubble dynamics near a surface of urinary stone.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; William M Behnke-Parks; Kevin Schmidmayer; Kazuki Maeda; Tim Colonius; Thomas W Kenny; Daniel J Laser
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J Langenauer; P Betschart; L Hechelhammer; S Güsewell; H P Schmid; D S Engeler; D Abt; V Zumstein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Fragility of brushite stones in shock wave lithotripsy: absence of correlation with computerized tomography visible structure.

Authors:  James C Williams; Tariq Hameed; Molly E Jackson; Syed Aftab; Alessia Gambaro; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Stability of the infection marker struvite in urinary stone samples.

Authors:  James C Williams; Andrew J Sacks; Kate Englert; Rachel Deal; Takeisha L Farmer; Molly E Jackson; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Robustness of Textural Features to Predict Stone Fragility Across Computed Tomography Acquisition and Reconstruction Parameters.

Authors:  Taylor Moen; Andrea Ferrero; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Distinguishing characteristics of idiopathic calcium oxalate kidney stone formers with low amounts of Randall's plaque.

Authors:  Xiangling Wang; Amy E Krambeck; James C Williams; Xiaojing Tang; Andrew D Rule; Fang Zhao; Eric Bergstralh; Zejfa Haskic; Samuel Edeh; David R Holmes; Loren P Herrera Hernandez; John C Lieske
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.