Literature DB >> 29845319

Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.

J Langenauer1, P Betschart1, L Hechelhammer2, S Güsewell3, H P Schmid1, D S Engeler1, D Abt1, V Zumstein4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictive value of advanced non-contrasted computed tomography (NCCT) post-processing using novel CT-calculometry (CT-CM) parameters compared to established predictors of success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for urinary calculi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: NCCT post-processing was retrospectively performed in 312 patients suffering from upper tract urinary calculi who were treated by SWL. Established predictors such as skin to stone distance, body mass index, stone diameter or mean stone attenuation values were assessed. Precise stone size and shape metrics, 3-D greyscale measurements and homogeneity parameters such as skewness and kurtosis, were analysed using CT-CM. Predictive values for SWL outcome were analysed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) statistics.
RESULTS: Overall success rate (stone disintegration and no re-intervention needed) of SWL was 59% (184 patients). CT-CM metrics mainly outperformed established predictors. According to ROC analyses, stone volume and surface area performed better than established stone diameter, mean 3D attenuation value was a stronger predictor than established mean attenuation value, and parameters skewness and kurtosis performed better than recently emerged variation coefficient of stone density. Moreover, prediction of SWL outcome with 80% probability to be correct would be possible in a clearly higher number of patients (up to fivefold) using CT-CM-derived parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Advanced NCCT post-processing by CT-CM provides novel parameters that seem to outperform established predictors of SWL response. Implementation of these parameters into clinical routine might reduce SWL failure rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D; CT-Calculometry (CT-CM); Homogeneity; Predictor; SWL; Urinary calculi

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29845319     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2348-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  21 in total

1.  CT Texture Analysis of Ex Vivo Renal Stones Predicts Ease of Fragmentation with Shockwave Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Helen W Cui; Wout Devlies; Samuel Ravenscroft; Hendrik Heers; Andrew J Freidin; Robin O Cleveland; Balaji Ganeshan; Benjamin W Turney
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Joshua D Wiesenthal; Daniela Ghiculete; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-13

3.  A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.

Authors:  Idir Ouzaid; Said Al-qahtani; Sébastien Dominique; Vincent Hupertan; Pédro Fernandez; Jean-François Hermieu; Vincent Delmas; Vincent Ravery
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Best practices in shock wave lithotripsy: a comparison of regional practice patterns.

Authors:  Robert D Brown; Shubha De; Carl Sarkissian; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Prediction of successful shock wave lithotripsy with CT: a phantom study using texture analysis.

Authors:  Manoj Mannil; Jochen von Spiczak; Thomas Hermanns; Hatem Alkadhi; Christian D Fankhauser
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-06

6.  Value of ultrasonography and helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of stone-free patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (USG and helical CT after SWL).

Authors:  Bora Küpeli; Serhat Gürocak; Lütfi Tunç; Cağri Senocak; Ustünol Karaoğlan; Ibrahim Bozkirli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?

Authors:  Gautier Müllhaupt; Daniel S Engeler; Hans-Peter Schmid; Dominik Abt
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  The success of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy based on the stone-attenuation value from non-contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Amr M Massoud; Ahmed M Abdelbary; Ahmad A Al-Dessoukey; Ayman S Moussa; Ahmed S Zayed; Osama Mahmmoud
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2014-02-16

10.  CT visible internal stone structure, but not Hounsfield unit value, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro.

Authors:  Chad A Zarse; Tariq A Hameed; Molly E Jackson; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; James C Williams
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-06-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Importance of precise imaging for stone identification during shockwave lithotripsy: a critical evaluation of "OptiVision" as a post-processing radiography imaging modality.

Authors:  Kemal Sarica; Mehmet Ferhat; Rei Ohara; Sameer Parmar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.436

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.